Bayesian Benefit-Risk Analysis for Sustainable Process Design
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 1
Abstract
A Bayesian model for assessing uncertain and variable economics of proposed environmentally conscious and other manufacturing processes from available information is described in this paper. Economic risks may stem from environmental, health, and safety liabilities; potential product losses; and other intangibles. Benefits and costs may be uncertain due to lack of information and experience within the available time and budget, or may be inherently variable in nature. Bayesian inference allows the integrated use of available numeric data, related data, summary statistics, and professional judgment. The Principle of Maximum Entropy is used as a basis for incorporation of subjective information. A Bayesian Pareto incident-size distribution is used to model size distributions for individual costs. Sensitivity analysis is used to help identify primary elements of project economic risk. Probability distributions for planning period costs, exceedance probabilities, and other risk indicators for alternative paint-stripping projects were computed and compared for an example industrial facility. The relative importance of variability and uncertainty as a function of planning-period length is probed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abkowitz, M., Eiger, A., and Srinivasen, S. (1984). “Assessing the releases and costs associated with truck transport of hazardous wastes.”Final Rep. U.S. EPA Contract No. 68-01-6621, Office of Solid Waste, ICF Inc., Washington, D.C.
2.
Aitchison, J., and Dunsmore, I. R. (1975). Statistical prediction analysis. Cambridge University Press, London, England.
3.
Beard, R. E., Pentikainen, T., and Pesonen, E. (1984). Risk theory: the stochastic basis of insurance. Chapman and Hall, Ltd., New York, N.Y.
4.
“Chemical burn injuries.” (1989). Bull. 2353, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
5.
Cooke, R. M. (1991). Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
6.
Efron, B. (1982). “The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans.”CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, No. 38, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa.
7.
Englehardt, J. D. (1991). “Economic evaluation and risk analysis for industrial waste minimization design,”PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
8.
Englehardt, J. D.(1995). “Predicting incident size from limited information.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 121(6), 455–464.
9.
Englehardt, J. D., and Lund, J. R.(1992). “Information theory in risk analysis.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 118(6), 890–904.
10.
“Facility pollution prevention guide.” (1992). EPA/600/R-92/088, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C.
11.
Halogenated solvent cleaners: emission control technologies and cost analyses. (1990). Radian Corp., Noyes Data Corp., Park Ridge, N.J.
12.
Jaynes, E. T. (1968). “Prior probabilities.”IEEE Trans. on Sys. Sci. and Cybernetics, SSC-4(3).
13.
Keoleian, G., and Menerey, D. (1993). Life cycle design manual: environmental requirements and the product system. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, D.C.
14.
Page, T., and Ricci, P. (1985). “Chapter 2: a cost-benefit perspective for risk assessment.”Principles of health risk assessment, P. Ricci, ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 37–65.
15.
Park, C., and Sharpe-Bette, G. (1990). Advanced engineering economics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
16.
Petty, W., Scott, D., and Bird, M.(1975). “The capital expenditure decision-making process of large corporations.”The Engrg. Economist, 20(3), 159–172.
17.
Pollution prevention benefits manual. (1990). ICF Inc., and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Solid Waste/Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, available from Office of Pollution Prevention, Washington, D.C.
18.
Ross, S. M. (1985). Introduction to probability models, 3rd Ed., Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
19.
Schwartz, S. I., McBride, R. A., and Powell, R. L.(1989). “Models for aiding hazardous waste facility siting decisions.”J. Envir. Sys., 18(2), 97–122.
20.
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.
21.
Sundt, B., and Jewell, W. (1981). “Further results on recursive evaluation of compound distributions.”The Astin Bull., No. 12, 27–39.
22.
White, A., Becker, M., and Goldstein, J. (1992). Total cost assessment: accelerating industrial pollution prevention through innovative project financial analysis. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, D.C.
23.
Withers, J. (1988). Major industrial hazards: their appraisal and control. Halsted Press, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123 • Issue 1 • January 1997
Pages: 71 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1997
Published in print: Jan 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.