Optimal Regional Scheduling of Solid Waste Systems. II: Model Solutions
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 9
Abstract
In this paper, solutions of a regional-scheduling model are presented to demonstrate the ability of the model to optimally schedule processing, conversion, and landfilling options to realize the lowest possible long-term costs for a regional integrated solid waste management system. The model is driven by the capacity and tipping fees for each existing or proposed landfill along with the capacity, costs, and revenues of implementing each processing or conversion option. Model results indicate that the implementation of processing and conversion options can reduce long-term costs by increasing the life of less expensive landfills, thus pushing the opening of more expensive landfills further into the future. Model solutions are used to show the effect of landfill capacities and tipping fees on scheduling. Figures are presented to illustrate interactions between model parameters, optimal costs, and scheduling.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Coffman, T. (1992). “Cost impacts of subtitle D on Oklahoma landfills,” Master's thesis, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla.
2.
Deyle, R. E., and Schade, B. F. (1991). “Residential recycling in mid-America: The cost effectiveness of curbside programs in Oklahoma.”Resour., Conservation and Recycling, (5), 305–327.
3.
Everett, J., and Modak, A.(1996). “Optimal regional scheduling of solid waste systems. I: Model development.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 122(9), 785–792.
4.
Schade, B. F. (1989). “Solid waste management in Oklahoma, an economic analysis,” Master's thesis, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla.
5.
Schrage, L. (1984). Linear, integer, and quadratic programming with LINDO . The Scientific Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
6.
Tchobanoglaus, T., Theisen, H., and Vigil, S. (1993). Integrated solid waste management—engineering principles and management issues . McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
7.
Tellus Institute. (1993). “WastePlan—the integrated solid waste management planning tool.”Default Data Rep., Tellus Inst., Boston, Mass.
8.
The Benham Group. (1993). “The Metro cities solid waste management plan.”Phase III Study Rep., Oklahoma County, Okla.
9.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1990). Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States, 1990 update . Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1996
Published in print: Sep 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.