Optimum Simulation and Control of Fixed-Speed Pumping Stations
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 3
Abstract
Traditional set point control and operation of a pumping station using fixed speed pumps usually amplify both the frequency and magnitude of variations in the influent flow rate. The purpose of the present study is to develop a control strategy to minimize these unwanted hydraulic surges. To realize this, an optimum control model was developed using computer simulation. The model is suitable for both separate and combined pumping installations. It is superior to conventional set point control techniques and reduces the frequency of starting and stopping pumps as well as energy consumption. The model uses energy saving and outflow smoothing factors to provide the improved control. Appropriate values of the two factors will depend on specific site conditions, such as pump lift height, wet-well depth, number of pumps and their sizes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Andrews, J. F. (1984). “Sagemont computer monitoring and control study report: pump station monitoring and control system.”Rep. Prepared for Wastewater Div., Dept. of Public Works, City of Houston, Dept. of Envir. Sci. and Engrg., Rice Univ. Houston Tex.
2.
Bouck, D. W., and Webb, J. B.(1980). “Orlando's variable-rate pumping station saves money,”Water and Wastes Engrg., 17, 20–23.
3.
Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: forecasting and control, Holden Day, San Francisco, Calif.
4.
Elmquist, H., Astrom, K. J., Schonthal, T., and Wittenmark, B. (1990). Simnon-user's guide for MS-DOS computer, Ver. 3.0, SSPA Systems, Goteborg, Sweden.
5.
Goldschmidt, G.(1978). “Mixing fixed-speed pumps to variable flows.”J. Water Pollution Control Federation, 51(12), 1733–1741.
6.
IAWPRC Tasking Group. (1989). “Real-time control of urban drainage systems, the state-of-the-art.”Sci. and Tech. Rep. No. 2, Int. Assoc. of Water Pollution Res. and Control, London, U.K.
7.
Ignizio, J. P. (1982). Linear programming in single & multiple objectives systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
8.
Olsson, G., and Stephenson, J. P.(1985). “The propagation of hydraulic sludge disturbances and flow rate reconstruction in activated plants.”Envir. Technol. Letters, 6, 536–545.
9.
Pankratz, A. (1983). Forecasting with univariate box-jenkins models . John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
10.
Pincince, A. B.(1970). “Wet-well volume for fixed-speed pumps.”J. Water Pollution Control Federation, 42(1), 126–130.
11.
Robinson, R. B., Robbins, R., Martin, D., and Harris, K.(1991). “Dynamic model of pump station.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 117(6), 852–858.
12.
Seaware Corp. (1990). The EBL plust TH language user's guide . Ver. 2.0, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Wash.
13.
Statistical Graphics Corp. (1987). StatGraphics user's guide . STSC, Inc., Rockville, Md.
14.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1979). “The feasibility of flow smoothing stations in municipal sewage system.”Envir. Protection Technol. Ser., EPA-600/2-76-181, Cincinnati, Ohio.
15.
Vitasovic, Z. (1986). “An integrated control system for the activated sludge process,” PhD dissertation, Rice Univ., Houston, Tex.
16.
Yin, M. T. (1991). “Modeling and control of pumping stations and equalization basins,” MS thesis, Rice Univ., Houston, Tex.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 3 • March 1996
Pages: 205 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1996
Published in print: Mar 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.