Engineering Model for Fixed-Film Bioscrubbers
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 3
Abstract
The three basic types of biological treatment systems for the control of volatile organic compounds in air streams are the following: biofilters, in which microorganisms grow on a medium, such as soil, compost, peat, or mixtures of these materials with wood chips or polystyrene particles; suspended-growth bioscrubbers, in which microorganisms are suspended in a liquid; and fixed-film bioscrubbers, in which microorganisms are attached to a packing material. Design and application of biological treatment methods for air pollution control are difficult because only limited experimental data and few theoretical models are available. This paper utilizes an engineering simulation model of a fixed-film bioscrubber to investigate the applicability, removal efficiency, operational parameters, and design requirements for gaseous waste streams. Model results indicate that the removal efficiencies can be increased by increasing the column height, decreasing the superficial gas velocity or the superficial liquid velocity, or by treating the liquid prior to recirculation to the absorber. High removal efficiencies can be obtained for compounds with relatively low values of the Henry's Law coefficient with either cocurrent or countercurrent operation. However, as the Henry's Law coefficient increases, the removal efficiency decreases and high removal efficiencies can be obtained only with cocurrent flow. Cocurrent operation is usually more efficient because stripping does not occur at the top of the column.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Apel, W. A., Dugan, P. R., and Wiebe, M. R.(1990). “Use of methanotropic bacteria in gas phase bioreactors to abate methane in coal mine atmospheres.”Fuel, 70(8), 1001–1003.
2.
Diks, R. M. M., and Ottengraf, S. P. P.(1991a). “Verification studies of a simplified model for the removal of dichloromethane from waste gases using a biological trickling filter (Part I).”Bioprocess Engrg., 6(3), 93–99.
3.
Diks, R. M. M., and Ottengraf, S. P. P.(1991b). “Verification studies of a simplified model for the removal of dichloromethane from waste gases using a biological trickling filter (Part II).”Bioprocess Engrg., 6(4), 131–140.
4.
Gantzer, C. J.(1989). “Inhibitory substrate utilization by steady-state biofilms.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 115(2), 302–319.
5.
Grady, C. P. L. Jr., and Lim, H. C. (1980). Biological Wastewater Treatment, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N. Y., 320–324, 509–557, 715–748.
6.
Grady, C. P. L. Jr., Aichinger, G., Cooper, S. F., and Naziruddin, N. (1989). “Biodegradation kinetics for selected toxic/hazardous organic compounds.”Hazardous Waste Treatment: Biosystems for Pollution Control, Air and Waste Management Assoc., Pittsburgh, Pa., 141–151.
7.
Hartmans, S., and Tramper, J. (1991). “Dichloromethane removal from waste gases with a trickle-bed bioreactor.”Bioprocess Engrg. 6(4), 83–92.
8.
Howard, P. H. (1990). Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals . Vol. II, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Mich.
9.
Laurent, A., and Charpentier, J.-C.(1983). “The use of experimental laboratory-scale models in predicting the performance of gas-liquid reactors.”Int. Chem. Engrg., 23(2), 265–274.
10.
Ockeloen, H. F. (1992). “A biological fixed-film simulation model for the control of volatile organic componds,” Master's of Engineering Special Problem Rep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, S.C., 79.
11.
Ottengraf, S. P. P. (1986). “Exhaust gas purification.”Biotechnology, H.-J. Rehm and G. Reed, eds., Chapter 12, Vol. 8, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany, 426–452.
12.
Overcamp, T. J., Chang, H.-c, and Grady, C. P. L. Jr.(1993). “An integrated theory for suspended-growth bioscrubbers.”J. Air and Waste Mgmt. Assoc., 43(5), 753–759.
13.
Rittmann, B. E., and McCarty, P. L.(1978). “Variable-order model of bacterial-film kinetics.”Envir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 104(5), 889–899.
14.
Rittmann, B. E., and McCarty, P. L.(1981). “Substrate flux into biofilms of any thickness.”J. Envir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(4), 831–849.
15.
Sáez, P. B., and Rittmann, B. E.(1988). “Improved pseudoanalytical solution for steady-state biofilm kinetics.”Biotech. Bioengrg., 32, 379–385.
16.
Togna, A. P., and Singh, M.(1994). “Biological vapor-phase treatment using biofilter and biotrickling filter reactors: practical operating regimes.”Envir. Prog., 13(2), 94–97.
17.
Thibodeaux, L. J. (1979). Chemodynamics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 46.
18.
Tchobanoglous, G., and Burton, F. L. (1991). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y., 621.
19.
Utgikar, V., Shan, Y., and Govind, R. (1991). “Bidegradation of volatile organic compounds in aerobic and anaerobic biofilters.”Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of Hazardous Waste, Proceedings of the 17th Annual Hazardous Waste Research Symposium, Cincinnati, Ohio, 370–387.
20.
Williamson, K. J., and Chung, T. H. (1975). “Dual limitations of substrate utilization kinetics within bacterial film.”49th Annu. Am. Inst. of Chem. Engrs. Meeting, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 3 • March 1996
Pages: 191 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1996
Published in print: Mar 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.