Is CBOD5 Test Viable for Raw and Settled Wastewater?
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 7
Abstract
In recent years, the carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand ( CBOD5 ) test has been employed to determine the carbonaceous fraction of the biochemical oxygen demand ( BOD5 ) of final effluents in nitrifying systems. More recently, several states have required plants to analyze influents using the CBOD5 test to determine whether the 85% removal rule is being attained. The 1989 Standard for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Methods does not suggest—nor does the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) CBOD5 procedure studies justify—the use of the CBOD5 test for raw and settled wastewaters. Analysis of operational data from several plants demonstrates that the CBOD5 test seriously understates the true strength of influent and primary effluent wastewaters as defined by BOD5 and chemical oxygen demand ( COD ) tests. The result of using CBOD5 data could result in a 20–40% underdesign as well as cause nonexistent effluent violations of the EPA 85% removal criteria rule. The conclusion was that CBOD5 is an improper test for influent and settled raw wastewater.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Albertson, O. E. (1993). “The CBOD 5 test: More trouble than it's worth?”Water Envir. and Technol., Nov., 16–17.
2.
Carter, K. B. (1984). “30/30 hindsight.”JWPCF, 56 (4), 301–305.
3.
Hall, J. C., and Foxen, R. J. (1983). “Nitrification in BOD 5 test increases POTW non-compliance.”JWPCF, 55 (12), 1466–1469.
4.
McDermott, G. N. (1984). “Nitrification in the BOD 5 test.”JWPCF, 56 (4), 30.
5.
Metcalf, L., and Eddy, H. (1991). Wastewater engineering, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Ruchhoft, C. C., Placak, O. K., and Ettinger, M. B. (1948). “Correction of BOD 5 velocity constants for nitrification.”Sewage Works J., 20 (5), 832–840.
7.
Slayton, J. L., and Trovato, E. R. (1979). “Simplified N. O. D. determination.”Proc., 34th Annu. Purdue Conf., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Ind.
8.
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. (1989). 17 Ed., Am. Public Health Assoc., Washington, D.C.
9.
Water Environment Federation. (1992). “Wastewater treatment plant design.”Manual of Practice No. 8, Arlington, Va.
10.
Water Pollution Control Federation. (1977). “Wastewater treatment plant design.”Manual of Practice No. 8, Washington, D.C.
11.
Young, J. C. (1973). “Chemical methods for nitrification control.”JWPCF, 45 (4), 637–646.
12.
Young, J. C. (1983). “Comparison of three forms of 2 chloro-6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine as a nitrification inhibitor in BOD 5 tests.”JWPCF, 55 (4), 415–416.
13.
Young, J. C., and Baumann, E. R. (1972). “Demonstration of the electrolysis method for measuring BOD 5 .”Final Rep., EPA Demonstration Proj. 16020 DUN and ERI Rep., 72153, Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 121 • Issue 7 • July 1995
Pages: 515 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1995
Published in print: Jul 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.