Simulation of Long-Term Trends in Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 4
Abstract
A predictive mathematical model was employed to examine trends in Chesapeake Bay eutrophication from 1959 to 1988. The model provided details of processes and substances for which no record existed. The simulation indicated the volume of anoxic water was largest in the decade 1969–78. Since then, anoxic volume has declined. The decline was largely due to hydrodynamic effects. In 1969–78, high runoff caused the Bay to be highly stratified and inhibited oxygen transport to bottom waters. Less runoff in the years 1979–88 diminished stratification and allowed enhanced oxygen transport to bottom waters. When only years of similar stratification were compared, an increase in anoxic volume was noted from the 1959–68 decade to the 1979–88 decade. The increase was associated with increasing nitrogen concentration in runoff from two major tributaries and with increasing chlorophyll concentration in the mainstem Bay.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bahner, L., Reynolds, R., and Batuik, R. (1990). “Volumetric analysis of dissolved oxygen trends in the Chesapeake Bay: preliminary findings.”Rep., Chesapeake Bay Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Annapolis, Md.
2.
Cerco, C., and Cole, T.(1993). “Three-dimensional eutrophication model of Chesapeake Bay.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 119(6), 1006–1025.
3.
Cohn, T., DeLong, L., Gilroy, E., Hirsch, R., and Wells, D. (1989). “Estimating constituent loads.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 25, 937–942.
4.
Donigian, A., Bicknell, B., Patwardhan, A., Linker, L., Algre, D., Chang, C., and Reynolds, R. (1991). “Watershed model application to calculate bay nutrient loadings.”Rep., Chesapeake Bay Program Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Annapolis, Md.
5.
Flemer, D., Mackiernan, G., Nehlsen, W., and Tippie, V. (1983). “Chesapeake Bay: a profile of environmental change.”Rep., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Philadelphia. Pa.
6.
Guide, V., and Villa, O. (1972). “Chesapeake Bay nutrient input study.”Tech. Rep. 47, Annapolis Field Office, Region III, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Annapolis, Md.
7.
Heinle, D., D'Elia, C., Taft, J., Wilson, J., Cole-Jones, M., Caplins, A., and Cronin, E. (1980). “A historical review of water quality and climatic data from Chesapeake Bay with emphasis on effects of enrichment.”CBP-TR-002E, Chesapeake Bay Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Annapolis, Md.
8.
Kuo, A., and Neilson, B.(1987). “Hypoxia and salinity in Virginia estuaries.”Estuaries, 10(4), 277–283.
9.
Sanders, J., Cibik, S., D'Elia, C., and Boynton, W. (1987). “Nutrient enrichment studies in a coastal plain estuary: changes in phytoplankton species composition.”Can. J. Fisheries and Aquatic Sci., Vol. 44, 83–90.
10.
SAS Institute Inc. (1988). SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 edition . Cary, N.C.
11.
Seliger, H., and Boggs, J. (1988). “Long-term pattern of anoxia in the Chesapeake Bay.”Understanding the estuary: advances in Chesapeake Bay research, M. Lynch and E. Krone, eds., Chesapeake Research Consortium, Gloucester Point, Va., 570–585.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 121 • Issue 4 • April 1995
Pages: 298 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1995
Published in print: Apr 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.