Optimal Land Allocation for Solid‐ and Hazardous‐Waste Landfill Siting
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 5
Abstract
A multiobjective optimization model is presented to determine the efficient aggregation of land parcels for use as a solid‐ or hazardous‐waste landfill. In this work, a new constraint for measuring compactness and contiguity of the selected subregion is introduced. This constraint measures compactness and contiguity as a function of the subregion's outside perimeter and area. The model optimally selects and sizes the landfill site from multiple bundles of available discrete and irregularly shaped land parcels. Each bundle consists of several individual and irregular land parcels and is disjoint from all other bundles. The model is multiobjective in nature, addressing land purchase cost, compactness, and contiguity considerations. The quantity of land required is determined by a projection of the flow of waste from the communities, commercial areas, and industries the landfill serves. To illustrate the model, a case study is presented using the landfill‐site search process in Orange County, North Carolina.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arad, R. W., and Berechman, J. (1978). “A design model for allocating interrelated activities in discrete space.” Envir. and Plng. A, 10(11), 1319–1332.
2.
Bammi, D., and Bammi, D. (1979). “Development of a comprehensive land use plan by means of a multiple objective mathematical programming model.” Interfaces, 9(2), 50–63.
3.
Barber, G. M. (1976). “Land‐use plan design via interactive multiple‐objective programming.” Envir. and Plng. A, 8(6), 625–636.
4.
Benabdallah, S., and Wright, J. R. (1991). “Shape considerations in spatial optimization.” Civ. Engrg. Sys., 8(3), 145–152.
5.
Benabdallah, S., and Wright, J. R. (1992). “Multiple subregion allocation models.” J. Urban Plng. and Dev., ASCE, 118(1), 24–40.
6.
Cliff, A. D., and Haggett, P. (1970). “On the efficiency of alternative aggregations in region building problems.” Envir. and Plng., 2(3), 285–294.
7.
Corbitt, R. A. (1990). Standard handbook of environmental engineering. McGraw Hill, New York, N.Y., 8.28.
8.
Correia, P. V. D., and Madden, M. (1985). “Optimisation of land purchasing and management using mixed integer programming: a case study in a Portuguese municipal authority.” Envir. and Plng. B, Plng, and Des., 12(3), 335–349.
9.
Diamond, J. T., and Wright, J. R. (1988). “Design of an integrated spatial information system for multi‐objective land‐use planning.” Envir. and Plng. B, Plng. and Des., 15, 205–214.
10.
Diamond, J. T., and Wright, J. R. (1989). “Efficient land allocation.” J. Urban Plng. and Dev., ASCE, 115(2), 81–95.
11.
Gilbert, K. C., Holmes, D. D., and Rosenthal, R. E. (1985). “A multiobjective discrete optimization model for land allocation.” Mgmt. Sci., 31(12), 1509–1522.
12.
Glenn, J. (1992). “The state of garbage in America, part 1.” BioCycle, 33(4), 46–55.
13.
Hopkins, L. (1977). “Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation.” J. Am. Inst. of Planners, 43(3), 396–400.
14.
Hopkins, L., and Los, M. (1979). “Location‐allocation algorithms for land use design and fixed and suitable interactions.” J. Regional Sci., 19(3), 173–98.
15.
Jacobs, T., and Everett, J. (1992). “Optimal scheduling of consecutive landfill operations with recycling.” J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 118(3), 420–429.
16.
Jacobs, T., and Miranda, M. L. (1922). The Orange County landfill case study. II‐1(Dec.), Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Sanford, N.C.
17.
Jewell, T. K. (1986). A systems approach to civil engineering planning and design. Harper and Row Publishers, New York, N.Y., 448–466.
18.
Joyce Engineering, Inc. and Bain, Palmer & Associates, Inc. (1991). Report of additional services to the landfill site search, Orange regional landfill, Sanford, N.C., 44.
19.
Keane, M. (1975). “The size of the region building problem.” Envir. and Plng. A, 7(5), 575–577.
20.
Lane, W., and McDonald, R. (1983). “Land suitability analysis: Landfill siting.” J. Urban Plng. and Dev., ASCE, 109(1), 50–61.
21.
Lund, J. (1990). “Least‐cost scheduling of solid waste recycling.” J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 116(1), 182–197.
22.
Meier, R. (1968). “Programming of recreational land acquisition.” Socio‐Economic Plng. Sci., 2(1), 15–24.
23.
1990 census of population and housing, summary population and housing characteristics. (1991). U.S. Department of Commerce, 1990 CPH‐1‐35, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
24.
Nishikawa, Y., Sannimiya, N., Maeda, M., and Kitumura, T. (1977). “Multiobjective linear programming model as applied to regional land‐use planning.” Proc. IFAC Workshop, Urban, Regional and National Planning (UNRENAP), Kyoto, Japan, Aug.
25.
North Carolina solid waste management rules as amended through March 1, 1989. (1989). Dept. of Envir., Health, and Natural Resources, Solid Waste Mgmt. Div., Solid Waste Section, Raleigh, N.C.
26.
Ripper, M., and Varaiya, P. (1974). “An optimizing model of urban development.” Envir. and Plng. A, 6(2), 149–168.
27.
Singhal, J. (1991). ZOOM user's manual. Dept. of Informat. and Quantitative Sci., Univ. of Baltimore, Baltimore, Md.
28.
Solid waste disposal facility criteria: final rule (40 CFR, parts 257 and 258). (1991). Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
29.
Wright, J., ReVelle, C., and Cohon, J. (1983). “A multiobjective integer programming model for the land acquisition problem.” Regional Sci. and Urban Economics, 13(1), 31–53.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 11, 1992
Published online: Sep 1, 1994
Published in print: Sep 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.