Risk Variability from Uniform Soil Remediation Goals for PCBs
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 3
Abstract
A methodology for evaluating the variability of risk resulting from the use of uniform, concentration‐based soil‐quality criteria is developed and applied to polychlorinated‐biphenyl‐(PCB‐) contaminated soil as an example. A modified version of a soil risk model developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is used to assess risk variability for different levels of PCBs in soil, representing different cleanup goals. Continuous distributions representing the variability in site conditions across the United States are assigned to parameters in the fate and transport model to examine the effect that such variability has on individual risk when uniform cleanup levels for PCBs in soil are used. It is found that for a fixed cleanup goal applied uniformly to all sites, the risk varies little for the case where the hypothetical exposure occurs on‐site, but by as much as two orders of magnitude for the case where the hypothetical maximally exposed individual resides off‐site. Depending on the risk goal of the remediation program, some risk variability may be acceptable and a uniform cleanup goal may be warranted to expedite the remediation process.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Climatic atlas of the United States. (1968). U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
2.
Developing cleanup standards for contaminated soil, sediment, and groundwater: How clean is clean?: Specialty conference series proceedings. (1993). Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C.
3.
Farmer, W. J., Igue, K., Spencer, W. F., and Martin, J. P. (1972). “Volatilization of organochlorine insecticides from soil.” Soil Sci. Society of America J. Proc., 36, 443–447.
4.
Hamaker, J. W., and Thompson, J. M. (1972). “Adsorption.” Organic chemicals in the soil environment, C. A. I. Goring and J. W. Hamaker, eds., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
5.
Hoffman, E. L., Nason, T., Gaudet, C., Cureton, P., and Raphael, R. (1993). “Setting cleanup goals for contaminated sites: Toward a nationally consistent approach in Canada.” Developing cleanup standards for contaminated soil, sediment, and groundwater: How clean is clean? Specialty conference series proceedings. Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C., 69–80.
6.
Integrated risk information system (IRIS). (1990). Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
7.
Jury, W. A., Grover, R., and Spencer, W. J. (1980). Modelling vapor losses of soil incorporated triallate. Soil Sci. Society of America J., 44, 445–450.
8.
Labieniec, P. A., Dzombak, D. A., and Siegrist, R. L. (1994). “Modified OHEA Risk Model for Soil Contaminated with PCBs.” Tech. Report, No. R‐94213, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa.
9.
Lyman, W. J., Reehl, W. F., and Rosenblatt, D. H. (1990). Handbook of chemical property estimation methods. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
10.
Morgan, M. G., Henrion, M., and Small, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
11.
“National oil and hazardous substances pollution contingency plan.” (1990). Federal Register, 55(46), 8813–8865.
12.
“PCB spill cleanup policy; final rule.” (1987). Federal Register, 53(63), 10688–10710.
13.
Siegrist, R. L. (1989). “International perspectives on cleanup standards for contaminated land, Sept. 10–13, Pittsburgh.” Third international conference on new frontiers for hazardous waste management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
14.
“Site remediation program cleanup standards for contaminated sites: Proposed new rules NJAC 7:26D.” (1992). New Jersey Register, 24(3), 373–403.
15.
Smith, V. J., and Charbeneau, R. J. (1990). “Probabilistic soil contamination exposure assessment procedures.” J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 116(6), 1143–1163.
16.
Spiegel, M. R. (1961). Schaum's outline series: Theory and problems of statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
17.
Turner, D. B. (1970). Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.
18.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1986). “Development of Advisory Levels for PCBs Cleanup.” Report No. EPA/600/6‐86/002, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
19.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989). “Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume 1 human health evaluation manual (part A).” Report No. EPA/540/1‐89/002, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. Environ. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
20.
Wishbow, N., and Henrion, M. (1987). DEMOS user's manual version three. Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 3 • May 1994
Pages: 495 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 22, 1992
Published online: May 1, 1994
Published in print: May 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.