TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 1990

Molecular Size Distributions of Dissolved Organic Matter

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 6

Abstract

Discrete molecular size distributions of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in natural waters and wastewaters are usually determined using an array of ultrafiltration membranes in stirred cells. However, many researchers neglect membrane rejection, resulting in an underestimation of DOM in low molecular weight size classes. In this paper, we develop a simple model, based on a permeation coefficient, that can be used to improve the accuracy of size distributions. Since permeation coefficients are a function of membrane material and water composition, these coefficients must be determined for every water sample. The utility of the model is demonstrated by comparing unadjusted and adjusted size distributions of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in ground waters and municipal wastewaters. For example, when membrane rejection is neglected, 41% of the DOC in Biscayne Aquifer ground water has an apparent molecular weight greater than 5,000 amu. Size distributions determined using the permeation coefficient model, however, indicate only 16% of the DOC is greater than 5,000 amu.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Alleman, B. (1986). “Molecular weight distributions of total organic halide in aerated stabilization basin treating paper and pulp wastewater,” thesis presented to the University of Arizona, at Tucson, Arizona, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Civil Engineering.
2.
Amicon Corp., “Laboratory separation, membrane filtration chromatography.” (1987). Publ. No. 716, Danvers, Mass.
3.
Amy, G. L., Bryant, C. W., and Belyani, M. (1986). “Molecular weight distributions of soluble organic matter in various secondary and tertiary effluents.” Water Sci. Tech., 19, 529–538.
4.
Amy, G. L., et al. (1987). “Comparison of gel‐permeation chromatography and ultrafiltration for molecular weight characterization of aquatic organic matter and humic substances.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 79(1), 43–49.
5.
Carey, T. (1989). “Orange County California groundwater characteristics and treatability,” thesis presented to the University of Arizona, at Tucson, Arizona, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Civil Engineering.
6.
Chaducek, M. W., and Fane, A. G. (1984). “The dynamics of polarisation in unstirred and stirred ultrafiltration.” J. Membr. Sci., 21, 145–160.
7.
Chiou, C. T., et al. (1986). “Water solubility enhancement of some organic pollutants and pesticides by dissolved humic and fulvic acids.” Envir. Sci. Tech., 20(3), 502–508.
8.
Collins, M. R., Amy, G. L., and King, P. H. (1985). “Removal of organic matter in water treatment.” J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 111(6), 850–864.
9.
Collins, M. R., Amy, G. L., and Steelink, C. (1986). “Molecular weight distribution, carboxylic acidity, and humic substances content of aquatic organic matter: Implications for removal during water treatment.” Envir. Sci. Tech., 20(10), 1028–1032.
10.
El‐Rehaili, A. M., and Weber, W. J. Jr., (1987). “Correlation of humic substance trihalomethane formation potential and adsorption behavior to molecular weight distribution in raw and chemically treated waters.” Water Res., 21(5), 573–582.
11.
Fane, A. G. (1986). “Ultrafiltration: Factors influencing flux and rejection.” Prog. Filtration Separation, 4, 101–179.
12.
Grady, C. P. L. Jr., et al. (1984). “Molecular weight distributions in activated sludge effluents.” Water Res., 18(2), 239–246.
13.
Hart, O. O. (1980). “Development and application of a technique for molecular mass distributions of organic compounds in water.” Water Sci. Tech., 12, 525–536.
14.
Kleinstreuer, C., and Belfort, G. (1984). “Mathematical modeling of fluid flow and solute distribution in pressure‐driven membrane modules.” Synthetic membrane processes: Fundamentals and water applications, G. Belfort, ed., Academic Press, New York, N.Y., 131–190.
15.
Knuutinen, J., et al. (1988). “High‐performance liquid chromatographic study of dissolved organic matter in natural waters.” Water Res., 22(8), 985–990.
16.
Leung, W.‐F., and Probstein, R. F. (1979). “Low polarization in laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions.” Ind. Engrg. Chem. Fundam., 18(3), 274–278.
17.
Levine, A. D., Tchobanoglous, G., and Asano, T. (1985). “Characterization of the size distribution of contaminants in wastewater: Treatment and reuse implications.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 57(7), 805–816.
18.
Logan, B. E., Hermanowicz, S. W., and Parker, D. S. (1987a). “A fundamental model for trickling filter process design.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 59(12), 1017–1028.
19.
Logan, B. E., Hermanowicz, S. W., and Parker, D. S. (1987b). “Engineering implications of a new trickling filter model.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 59(12), 1029–1042.
20.
Miles, C. J., and Brezonik, P. L. (1983). “High‐performance size exclusion chromatography of aquatic humic substances.” J. Chromat., 259, 499–503.
21.
Miller, S. D. (1988). “Mass separation techniques for the design of fixed‐film bioreactors,” thesis presented to the University of Arizona, at Tucson, Arizona, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Civil Engineering.
22.
Nakao, S.‐I., and Kumura, S. (1981). “Analysis of solutes rejection in ultrafiltration.” J. Chem. Engrg. Japan, 14(1), 32–37.
23.
Namkung, E., and Rittman, B. E. (1986). “Soluble microbial products (SMP) formation kinetics by biofilms.” Water Res., 20(6), 795–806.
24.
Porter, M. C. (1972). “Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration.” Ind. Engrg. Chem. Prod. Res. Develop., 11(3), 234–248.
25.
Sachdev, D. R., Ferris, J. J., and Clesceri, N. L. (1976). “Apparent molecular weights of organics in secondary effluents.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 48, 570–579.
26.
Synthetic membrane processes: Fundamentals and water applications. (1984). G. Belfort, ed., Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
27.
Thurman, E. M., et al. (1982). “Molecular size of aquatic humic substances.” Org. Geochem., 4(1), 27–35.
28.
van Steenderen, R. A., and Malherbe, A. (1982). “The molecular mass distribution of organic compounds in activated sludge plant effluent determined by means of gel permeation chromatography.” Water Res., 16, 745–748.
29.
Wheeler, J. R. (1976). “Fractionation by molecular weight of organic substrates in Georgia coastal waters.” Limnol. Oceanogr., 21(6), 847–852.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 116Issue 6October 1990
Pages: 1046 - 1062

History

Published online: Oct 1, 1990
Published in print: Oct 1990

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bruce E. Logan
Asst. Prof., Envir. Engrg. Program, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Qing Jiang
Grad. Student, Envir. Engrg. Program, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share