Fine‐Pore Diffuser Retrofit at Midgewood, New Jersey
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 5
Abstract
The Ridgewood Wastewater Treatment Plant in Ridgewood, New Jersey underwent a retrofit from a coarse‐bubble to fine‐pore aeration system. Also, process modification from contact stabilization to tapered air occurred. This paper provides a review of the case history of plant and aeration performance of each system from 1981 through 1986. Non‐steady state and off‐gas oxygen transfer field testing at the plant over the 6‐yr period provides the data base for the objective evaluation. An economic evaluation of retrofit impact is presented. Oxygen transfer efficiency of the fine pore system was approximately double that of the coarse bubble system. However, power costs were not reduced proportionately since a higher oxygen demand was supplied by the fine pore system to attain nitrification and meet the revised permit requirements. Severe nocardia foaming problems were encountered in the summer during the first three years of fine pore operation. These were controlled in the last two years by minimizing sludge recycle loads and preventing septic conditions in the aeration tanks.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Blank, L. (1980). Statistical procedures for engineering, management and science. McGraw‐Hill Series, New York, N.Y., 521.
2.
Hildreth, S. (1986). “Effects of hydraulics on nonsteady state field testing in tapered aeration tanks.” Thesis presented to the Manhattan College Envir. Engrg. and Sci. Program, at the Bronx, New York, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
3.
Mueller, J., Kim, C. W., and Court, N. (1982). “Ridgewood aeration system analysis, phase I. Coarse bubble sparger system.” Report to Burde Assocs., Manhattan Coll. Envir. Engrg. and Sci. Program, Bronx, New York, May.
4.
Mueller, J., Lee, S. J., and Elliott, P. (1983a). “Ridgewood aeration system analysis, phase II. Fine bubble dome system.” Report to Burde Assocs., Envir. Engrg. and Sci. Program, the Bronx, N.Y., May.
5.
Mueller, J. (1983b). “Nonsteady state field testing of surface and diffused aeration equipment.” Report to ASCE Committee on Oxygen Transfer Standards, Manhattan Coll. Envir. Engrg. and Sci. Program, the Bronx, N.Y., July.
6.
Mueller, J., Elliott, P, and Chung, I. (1984). “Nonsteady state analysis of Ridgewood tanks 3 & 4.” Report to Burde Assocs., Envir. Engrg. and Sci. Program, the Bronx, N.Y., Aug.
7.
Mueller, J., and Saurer, P. D. (1986). “Field evaluation of WYSS aeration system at Cedar Creek Plant, Nassau County, New York.” Report to Parkson Corp., Manhattan Coll. Envir. Engr. and Sci. Program, the Bronx, N.Y., Aug.
8.
Mueller, J., and Saurer, P. D. (1987). “Case history of fine pore diffuser retrofit at Ridgewood, N.J.” Report to ASCE Committee on Oxygen Transfer, Manhattan Coll. Envir. Engrg. and Sci. Program, the Bronx, N.Y., Apr.
9.
Mueller, J., and Stansel, H. D. (1987). “Biologically enhanced oxygen transfer in the activated sludge process—Fact or Folly?” Presented at 60th Annual WPCF Conf., Philadelphia, Pa., Oct.
10.
Mueller, J., and Boyle, W. C. (1988). “Oxygen transfer under process conditions.” J. WPCF, 60, 332–341, Mar.
11.
Operation and maintenance manual. (1983). Burde Assocs., Ridgewood, N.J.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1989
Published in print: Oct 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.