Screening of Groundwater Contaminants by Travel‐Time Distributions
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 3
Abstract
Analytical procedures are proposed for estimating probability distributions of travel times for chemical waste loads to groundwater. Travel distance of the chemical is treated as a renewal process, and travel time is given by the number of annual chemical displacements or renewals required for passage through the soil unsaturated zone. The methods were evaluated for two organic chemicals for a range of site conditions near Lexington, Kentucky, and Des Moines, Iowa. It was found that groundwater contamination risk is very dependent on site‐specific soil and hydrologic conditions. Probability distributions based on both hydrologic and soil spatial variability differed markedly from those that considered only hydrologic variability. The effect of soil spatial variability is to increase travel‐time variability and risk of groundwater contamination. Travel‐time probability distributions were combined with biochemical degradation rates to estimate the expected fraction of chemical mass reaching the water table. This fraction serves as a screening criterion to identify and rank combinations of chemicals and sites that are likely to produce groundwater pollution.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baes, C. F., and Sharp, R. D. (1983). “A proposal for estimation of soil leaching and leaching constants for use in assessment models.” J. Envir. Quality, 12(1), 17–28.
2.
Brady, N. C. (1974). The nature and properties of soils. 8th Ed., Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.
3.
Breiman, L. (1969). Probability and stochastic processes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass.
4.
Cameron, D. R. (1978). “Variability of soil water retention curves and predicted hydraulic conductivities on a small plot.” Soil Sci., 126(6), 364–371.
5.
Cassel, D. K., and Bauer, A. (1975). “Spatial variability in soils below depth of tillage: bulk density and fifteen atmosphere percentage.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 39(2), 247–250.
6.
Dayananda, P. W. A., et al. (1980). “Leaching of a sorbed solute: A model for peak concentration displacement.” Irrig., Sci., 1, 169–175.
7.
Enfield, C. G., et al. (1982). “Approximating pollutant transport to groundwater.” Ground Water, 20(6), 711–722.
8.
Gajem, Y. M., Warrick, A. W., and Myers, D. E. (1981). “Spatial dependence of physical properties of a typic torrifluvent soil.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 45(5), 709–715.
9.
Haith, D. A., and Shoemaker, L. L. (1987). “Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow nutrients.” Water Resour. Bull., 23(3), 471–478.
10.
Hamon, W. R. (1961). “Estimating potential evapotranspiration.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE 87(3), 107–120.
11.
ICF, Inc. (1986). “Superfund public health evaluation manual.” OSWER Directive 9285.4‐1, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
12.
Javandel, I., Doughty, C., and Tsang, C. F. (1984). “Groundwater transport: Handbook of mathematical models,” Water Resources Monograph 10, American Geophysical Union, Washington D.C.
13.
Jury, W. A. (1982). “Simulation of solute transport using a transfer function model.” Water Resour. Res., 18(2), 363–368.
14.
Jury, W. A., Focht, D. D., and Farmer, W. J. (1987). “Evaluation of pesticide groundwater pollution potential from standard indices of soil‐chemical adsorption and biodegradation.” J. Envir. Quality, 16(4), 422–428.
15.
Jury, W. A., Sposito, G., and White, R. E. (1986). “A transfer function model of solute transport through soil. 1. Fundamental concepts.” Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 243–247.
16.
Keogh, J. L., and Maples, R. (1967). “A statistical study of soil sampling of Arkansas alluvial soils.” Report Series 157, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Ark.
17.
Mader, D. L. (1963). “Soil variability—a serious problem in soil‐site studies in the Northeast.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 27(6), 707–709.
18.
Mahmood, R. J., and Sims, R. C. (1986). “Mobility of organics in land treatment systems.” J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 112(2), 236–245.
19.
Mills, W. B., et al. (1985). “Water quality assessment: A screening procedure for toxic and conventional pollutants in surface and ground water.” EPA/600/6‐85/002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
20.
Milly, P. C. D., and Eagleson, P. S. (1987). “Effects of spatial variability on annual average water balance.” Water Resour. Res., 23(11), 2135–2143.
21.
Nielsen, D. R., Biggar, J. W., and Erh, K. T. (1973). “Spatial variability of fieldmeasured soil‐water properties.” Hilgardia, 42(7), 215–259.
22.
Northrup, M. L., and Boyle, J. R. (1975). “Soil bulk densities after thirty years under different management regimes.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 39(3), 588.
23.
Rogowski, A. S. (1972). “Watershed physics: soil variability criteria.” Water Resour. Res., 8(4), 1015–1023.
24.
Ruffner, J. A., and Bair, F. E., eds. (1979). The weather almanac. 2nd Ed., Avon Books, New York, N.Y.
25.
Topp, G. C., Zebchuk, W. D., and Dumanski, J. (1980). “The variation of in‐situ measured soil water properties within soil map units.” Can. J. Soil Sci., 60(3), 497–509.
26.
Van Der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., and Van Riemsdijk, W. H. (1987). “Transport of reactive solute in spatially variable soil systems.” Water Resour. Res., 23(11), 2059–2069.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 115 • Issue 3 • June 1989
Pages: 497 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1989
Published in print: Jun 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.