Minimizing Highway Noise Barrier Intrusion
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 110, Issue 3
Abstract
Highway noise control has been practiced in the United States for more than 10 years, as a result of direction provided by the Federal Highway Administration. Through 1980, more than 100 million dollars had been spent to construct more than 180 miles (300 km) of barriers throughout the country. Barriers, while providing important noise reduction, are often perceived negatively by the public. The reason for these negative perceptions relate to two basic issues; visual incompatibility and excessive cost. To minimize these negative perceptions is to minimize noise barrier intrusion. This paper examines specific ways to minimize intrusion, from the standpoints of both compatibility and cost. Data from the Synthesis Report 87 of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program are used in the discussion of compatibility. The data are from these topics: Barrier size and mass; material selection and color; landscaping; and citizen involvement. In the area of cost, a method for addressing multiple reflections problem is presented. This method is also designed to minimize barrier heights in certain situations requiring parallel barriers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, G. S., Cuoco, E., and Menge, C. W., “The Barrier Cost Reduction Program: A New Tool to Reduce Highway Noise Barrier Costs,” Proceedings of the Conference on Highway Traffic Noise Mitigation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1979.
2.
Barrass, A. N., and Cohn, L. F., “Noise Abatement and Public Policy Decisions:A Case Study—I‐440 in Nashville,” Transportation Research Record 789, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 40–45.
3.
Barry, T. M., and Reagan, J. A., “FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model,” FHWA‐RD‐77‐108, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1978.
4.
“Noise Barrier Cost Reduction Procedure STAMINA 2.0/OPTIMA: User's Manual,” Bowlby, W., Higgins, J., and Reagan, J. A., eds., FHWA‐DP‐58‐1, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 2–1–3–19.
5.
Cohn, L. F., “Highway Noise Barriers,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis of Highway Practice 87, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 30–51.
6.
Cohn, L. F., “A Comparison of Noise Barrier Programs in Japan and the United States,” Proceedings of the 1982 International Conference on Noise Control Engineering, pp. 543–546.
7.
Federal Aid Highway Program Manual, Volume 7, Chapter 7, Section 3, “Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise, U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
8.
Hajek, J. I., and Kwan, L., “The Effect of Parallel Highway Noise Barriers,” Report AE‐81‐03, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Downsview, 1981.
9.
Menge, C. W., “Highway Noise: Sloped Barriers as an Alternative to Absorptive Barriers,” Noise Control Engineering, Vol. 14, 1980, pp. 74–78.
10.
Pejaver, D. R., and Shadley, J. R., “A Study of Multiple Sound Reflection in Walled Highways and Tunnels,” Report DOT‐FH‐11‐8287, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1976.
11.
Title 23, United States Code, Section 109.
12.
White, F. A., Our Acoustic Environment, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 1975.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 110 • Issue 3 • June 1984
Pages: 534 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1984
Published in print: Jun 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.