Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Building and Civil Engineering Projects’ Claims Process: Interactive Effects of Outcome Favorability and Procedural Fairness
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 134, Issue 9
Abstract
Cooperation is fundamental to successful procurement and delivery of building and civil engineering projects. This study explores the role of perceived fairness as a motivator of cooperative behavior in the process for administering project claims. The objective is to investigate how a contractor’s perceptions about fairness of the procedure for administering project claims would interact with the outcome received from the claims to influence the contractor’s cooperative behavior in terms of conflict intensity and potential to dispute. The data collection instrument was a structured questionnaire. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 41 contractors’ personnel regarding their experience with claims on 41 completed projects in Singapore. The data were analyzed using the structural modeling approach. The results indicate that on projects where contractors did not receive a favorable outcome from claims, there was lower intensity of conflict and lower potential to dispute when contractors perceived that the procedure for administering the claims was fair than when the procedure was perceived to be unfair. The findings suggest that, in construction, cooperative behavior is a combined function of the outcome and procedure leading to that outcome. It also suggests that enhancing cooperative behavior goes beyond formal contract provisions but rather how the contract is administered in practice. It is recommended that employers’ project management team whose actions of rejecting invalid claims may be misinterpreted and disputed pay greater attention to how decisions on claims are reached. A fair procedure could cushion the effect of an unfavorable decision and thereby reduce a contractor’s uncooperative attitude.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). “Inequality in social exchange.” Advances in experimental social psychology, L. Berkowitz, ed., Vol. 2, Academic, New York.
Aibinu, A. A. (2006). “The relationship between distribution of control, fairness and potential for dispute in the claims handling process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 24(1), 45–54.
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations.” J. Pers Soc. Psychol., 51, 1173–1182.
Beals, A. R., and Siegel, B. (1966). Divisiveness and social conflict: An anthropological approach, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
Bercovitch, J., and Langley, J. (1993). “The nature of dispute and the effectiveness of international mediation.” J. Conflict Resolut., 37(4), 670–691.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, Wiley, New York.
Bresnen, M. (1991). “Construction contracting in theory and practice: A case study.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 9(3), 247–263.
Bresnen, M., and Marshall, N. (2000). “Partnering in construction: A critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 18(2), 229–237.
Brockner, J., Chen, Y., Mannix, E. A., Leung, K., and Skarlicki, D. P. (2000). “Culture an procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it.” Adm. Sci. Q., 45(1), 138–159.
Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger., R., Martin, C., and Bies, R. J. (1994). “Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss.” Acad. Manage J., 37, 397–409.
Brockner, J., and Weisenfeld, B. M. (1996). “An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: The interactive effects of outcomes and procedure.” Psychol. Bull., 120, 189–208.
Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). “Convergent and discriminant validity by multitrait-multimethod matrix.” Psychol. Bull., 56, 81–105.
Chin, W. W. (1998). “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling.” Modern methods for business research, G. A. Marcoulides, ed., Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J., 295–336.
Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS graph user’s guide, ver. 3.0., Soft Modeling Inc., ⟨http://www.pubinfo.vcu.edu/carma/Documents/OCT1405/PLSGRAPH3.0Manual.hubona.pdf⟩.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., and Newsted, P. R. (1996). “A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study.” Proc. Seventeenth Int. Conf. on Information Systems, J. DeGross, S. Jarvenpaa, and A. Srinivasan, eds., Association Information Systems, Atlanta, Ga.
Churchil, G. A. (1979). “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs.” J. Mark. Res., 16(2), 64–73.
Cohen, R. L. (1985). “Procedural justice and participation.” Hum. Relat., 38, 643–663.
Conlin, J., Langford, D., and Kennedy, P. (1996). “The relationship between construction procurement strategies and construction contract disputes.” CIB W92, North meets South, Durban, South Africa.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1991). “In search for partnering excellence.” CII special publication 17-1.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1998). “Innovative contractor compensation.” CII research summary 114-1.
Danhrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
Diekman, J., Girard, M., and Abdul-Hadi, N. (1994). “Disputes potential index: A study into the predictability of contract disputes.” Construction Industry Institute, source document 101, The University of Texas at Austin, Tex.
Egan, J. (1998). “Rethinking construction.” Rep. from the Construction Task Force, Dept. of the Environment, Transport and Regions, U.K.
Ehlen, C. R., Magner, N. R., and Welker, R. B. (1999). “Testing the interactive effects of outcome favorability and procedural fairness on members’ reaction toward a voluntary professional organization.” J. Occup. Organiz. Psychol., 72, 147–161.
Falk, R. F., and Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling, Akron: Univ. of Akron Press, Akron, Ohio.
Fenn, P., Lowe, D., and Speck, C. (1997). “Conflict and dispute in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15, 513–518.
Folger, R. (1977). “Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of ‘voice’ and improvement on experienced inequity.” J. Pers Soc. Psychol., 35, 108–119.
Folger, R. (1986). “Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model.” Justice in social relations, H. W. Beirhoff, R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg, eds., Plenum Press, New York, 145–162.
Gupta, N., and Beehr, T. (1982). “A test of the correspondence between self reports and alternative data sources about work organizations.” J. Vocat Behav., 20, 1–13.
Hellard, R. B. (1995). Project partnering: Principle and practice, Thomas Telford, London.
Homans, G. (1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms, Harcourt Brace World, New York.
Hulland, J. (1999). “Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies.” Strategic Manage. J., 20, 195–204.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1998). “Interaction and non-linear modeling: Issues and approaches.” Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling, R. E. Schumacker and G. A. Marcoulides, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J., 239–250.
Konovsky, M., and Pugh, D. S. (1994). “Citizenship behaviour and social exchange.” Acad. Manage J., 37, 656–669.
Kressel, K., and Pruitt, D. (1989). “Conclusion: A research perspective on the mediation of social conflict.” Mediation research, K. Kressel and D. G. Pruitt, eds., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 241–262.
Kumaraswamy, M. H. (1998). “Consequences of construction conflict: A Hong Kong perspective.” J. Manage. Eng., 14(3), 66–74.
Latham, M. (1994). “Constructing the team.” Final Rep. of the Government/industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry, HMSO, London.
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). “Fairness in social relationships.” Contemporary topics in social psychology, J. Thibaut, J. Spence, and R. Carson, eds., General Learning Press, Morristown, N.J.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). “What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships.” Social exchange, K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, and R. Willis, eds., Plenum, New York, 27–55.
Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., and de Vera Park, M. (1993). “Individual and corporate dispute resolution.” Adm. Sci. Q., 38, 224–251.
Lind, E. A., and Lissak, R. I. (1985). “Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments.” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 21, 19–29.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice, Plenum, New York.
MacCoun, R., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. L., and Ebener, P. A. (1988). Alternative adjudication: An evaluation of the New Jersey automobile arbitration program, Rand, Santa Monica, Calif.
Magner, N., Welker, R., and Johnson, G. (1996). “The interactive effects of participation and outcome favorability in performance appraisal on turnover intentions and evaluations of supervisors.” J. Occup. Organiz. Psychol., 69, 135–143.
March, J. G., and Simon, H. (1958). Organizations, Wiley, New York.
Nicklisch, F. (1990). “The role of the engineer as contract administrator and quasi arbitrator in international construction and civil engineering projects.” Int. Constr. Law Rev., 7(3), 323–338.
Podsakoff, P. M., and Organ, D. W. (1986). “Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects.” J. Manage., 12(4), 531–544.
Pondy, L. R. (1967). “Organisational conflict: Concepts and models.” Adm. Sci. Q., 12, 296–320.
Powell-Smith, V. and Sims, J. (1989). Building contract claims, 2nd edition, BSP Professional Books, London, U.K.
Provalis Research (2006). “ITALASSI.” ⟨http://www.provalisresearch.com/ITALASSI/ITALASSI.php⟩ (June 2007).
Schriesheim, C. A. (1979). “The similarity of individual directed and group directed leader behavior descriptions.” Acad. Manage J., 22, 345–355.
Schumacker, R. E. (2002). “Latent variable interaction modeling.” Struct. Equation Model., 9(1), 40–54.
Smith, K. W., and Sasaki, M. S. (1979). “Decreasing multicollinearity: A method for models with multiplicative functions.” Sociolog. Methods Res., 8, 35–56.
Staw, B. M. (1991). “Dressing up like an organization: When psychological theories can explain organisational action.” J. Manage., 4, 805–819.
Sweeney, P. D. and McFarlin, D. B. (1993). “Workers' evaluations of the “ends” and the “means”: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice.” Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, Vol. 55, 23–40.
Thibaut, J., and Kelly, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups, Wiley, New York.
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). “Procedural justice: A psychological analysis.” Erbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Tyler, T. R., and Bladder, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioural engagement, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, Pa.
Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). “A relational model of authority in groups.” Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 25, 115–191.
Youngblood, S., Trevino, L. K., and Favia, M. (1992). “Reactions to unjust dismissal and third-party dispute resolution: A justice framework.” Employee Responsibilities and Rights J., 5, 283–307.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 134 • Issue 9 • September 2008
Pages: 681 - 691
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 13, 2007
Accepted: Mar 26, 2008
Published online: Sep 1, 2008
Published in print: Sep 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.