TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 1, 2008

Application of a Sustainability Model for Assessing Water Main Replacement Options

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 134, Issue 8

Abstract

Sustainable development, conceived as a new and multidisciplinary paradigm, is receiving much attention throughout the global community. The purpose of this paper is to apply the sustainability assessment model (SAM), an assessment and decision making methodology, to a water main replacement project in an urban environment to determine the most sustainable project alternative among three possible options. This case study presents the use of SAM in considering various multicriteria sustainability indicators while working towards achieving sustainability enhancement. Objectives of sustainability enhancement include: (1) minimizing environmental impact; (2) maximizing economical benefit and output; (3) social and cultural conservation and promotion; and (4) satisfying basic requirements such as structural soundness and capacity. Six assessment methods including the analytic hierarchy process, cost, pollution, energy, time estimation, and natural resource depletion analysis are used for both qualitative and quantitative sustainability indicators. The weighted sum model is then utilized to integrate the six independent assessment results to elicit the final decision.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ariaratnam, S. T., and Allouche, E. N. (2000). “Suggested practices for installations using horizontal directional drilling.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 5(4), 142–149.
ASCE. (2004). “The role of civil engineer in sustainable development.” Policy Statement No. 418, http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/policy_details.cfm?hdlid=60 (Apr. 10, 2005).
Baumert, M. E., and Allouche, E. N. (2002). “Methods for estimating pipe pullback loads for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) crossings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(1), 12–20.
Bennett, R. D., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2005). Pipe bursting good practices, North America Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT), Arlington, Va.
Bennett, R. D., Ariaratnam, S. T., and Como, C. E. (2004). Horizontal directional drilling good practices guidelines, HDD Consortium, North America Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT), Arlington, Va.
Bourdeau, L. (2000). “Sustainable construction: A framework and international agenda for change.” Publication No. 260, Int. Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB).
Cheung, S. O., Lam, T. I., Leung, M. Y., and Wan, Y. W. (2001). “An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19(4), 427–437.
Dasgupta, S., and Tam, E. K. L. (2005). “Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32(1), 30–44.
Grigg, N. S. (2005). “Assessment and renewal of water distribution systems.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 97(2), 58–68.
Knight, M. (2004). “Trenchless installations preserve pavement integrity.” Proc., Soils and Materials Session of the 2004 Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada, TAC, Quebec City, 1–15.
Knight, M., Duyvestyn, G., and Gelinas, M. (2001). “Excavation of surface installed pipe.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(3), 123–129.
Koo, D., and Ariaratnam, S. (2008). “Modeling framework for sustainable underground infrastructure construction.” Proc., 2007 Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, Va., on CD Paper P38.
Lueke, J. S., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2001). “Rehabilitation of underground infrastructure utilizing trenchless pipe replacement.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 6(1), 25–34.
Mirza, S. (2006). “Durability and sustinability of infrastructure—A state-of-the-art report.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 33, 639–649.
Mohamed, Z., Nigem, K., Enshassi, A., and Ayyub, B. M. (2002). “Strategic implementation of infrastructure priority projects: Case study in Palestine.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(1), 2–11.
OPEC. (2004). “Annual statistical bulletin.” Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). www.opec.org/library/Annual%20Statistical%20Bulletin/asb2004.htm (Jan. 19, 2006).
Park, K., Hwang, Y., Seo, S., and Seo, H. (2003). “Quantitative assessment of environmental impacts on life cycle of highways.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(1), 25–31.
Pritchard, G. (2002). PVC—World markets and prospects, Rapra Technology & Industrial Arts, Shrewsbury, U.K.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sahely, H. R., Kennedy, C. A., and Adams, B. J. (2005). “Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32(1), 72–85.
Shapira, A., and Goldenberg, M. (2005). “AHP-based equipment selection model for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(12), 1263–1273.
Specht, E., Steinbrück, A., and Jeschar, R. (1996). “Eco-balances for the production of pipes for drains and sewers.” Brick and Tile Industry Int., 49(4), 224–230.
Tonn, B. (2004). “Integrated 1,000-year planning.” Futures, 36(1), 91–108.
Triantaphyllou, E., Kovalerchuk, B., Mann, L., Jr., and Knapp, G. M. (1997). “Determining the most important criteria in maintenance decision making.” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 3(1), 16–28.
Ugwu, O. O., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Wang, A., and Ng, S. T. (2006). “Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part I. Development of indicators and computational methods.” Autom. Constr., 15(2), 239–251.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2004). “GAP analysis report.” Rep. No. EPA 816-R-02-020, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
USGBC. (2006). “Leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED).” United States Green Building Council (USGBC), http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CategoryID=19 (June 20, 2006).
USGS. (2006). “Commodity statistics and information.” United States Geological Surveys (USGS) http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/ (Feb. 10, 2006).
Vanegas, J., DuBose, J., and Pearce, A. (1996). “Sustainable technologies for the building construction industry.” Proc., Symp. on Design for the Global Environment, Georgia Tech University, Atlanta, Ga., 1–16.
WCED. (1987). “Our common future.” World commission on environment and development (WCED), Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 134Issue 8August 2008
Pages: 563 - 574

History

Received: Aug 28, 2007
Accepted: Nov 28, 2007
Published online: Aug 1, 2008
Published in print: Aug 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dae-Hyun Koo
Project Engineer, Project Engineering Consultants, Phoenix, AZ 85308. E-mail: [email protected]
Samuel T. Ariaratnam, M.ASCE
Professor, Del E. Webb School of Construction, Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287-0204. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share