Quantifying the Impact of Schedule Compression on Labor Productivity for Mechanical and Sheet Metal Contractor
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133, Issue 4
Abstract
In a typical construction project, a contractor may often find that the time originally allotted to perform the work has been severely reduced. The reduction of time available to complete a project is commonly known throughout the construction industry as schedule compression. Schedule compression negatively impacts labor productivity and consequently becomes a source of dispute between owners and contractors. This paper examines how schedule compression affects construction labor productivity and provides a model quantifying the impact of schedule compression on labor productivity based on data collected from 66 mechanical and 37 sheet metal projects across the United States. The model can be used in a proactive manner to reduce productivity losses by managing the factors affecting productivity under the situation of schedule compression. Another useful application of the model is its use as a litigation avoidance tool after the completion of a project.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Borcherding, J. D., Samelson, N. M., and Sebastian, S. M. (1980). “Improving motivation and productivity on large projects.” J. Constr. Div., 106(1), 73–89.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1990). “Concepts and methods of schedule compression.” Research Rep. No. 6-7, Austin, Tex.
Haneiko, J. B., and Henry, W. C. (1991). “Impacts to construction productivity.” Proc., American Power Conf., 897–900.
Hanna, A. S. (2001). “Quantifying the impact of change orders on electrical and mechanical labor productivity.” Research Rep. No. 158-11, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
Heather, P. R. (1989). “‘Mathews curve’—A model for evaluating impact.” American Associate of Cost Engineers International Transactions, I.4.1–I.4.6.
Horner, R. M. W., and Talhouni, B. T. (1995). Effects of accelerated working, delays, and disruptions on labour productivity, Chartered Institute of Building, London.
Leonard, C. A. (1988). “The effects of change orders on productivity.” Master's thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
Long, R. J. (1988). “Proof of damages in construction claims.” American Association of Cost Engineers Transactions, AACE, U-2.
Marchman, D. A. (1988). “Impact of late delivery on construction productivity.” Proc., 24th ASC Annual Conf., San Luis Obispo, Calif., 76–82.
Noyce, D. A., and Hanna, A. S. (1997). “Planned schedule compression concept files for electrical contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(2), 189–197.
Noyce, D. A., and Hanna, A. S. (1998). “Planned and unplanned schedule compression: The impact on labour.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16(1), 79–90.
Peles, C. J. (1977). “Productivity analysis—A case study.” American Association of Cost Engineers Transactions, AACE, F-4, 277–285.
Thomas, H. R. (2000). “Schedule acceleration, work flow, and labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(4), 261–267.
Thomas, H. R., and Raynar, K. A. (1997). “Scheduled overtime and labor productivity: A quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(2), 181–188.
U.S. Army. (1979). Modification impact evaluation guide, Dept. of the Army, Office of the Chief Engineers, Washington, D.C., EP-415-1-3 at 3-2.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133 • Issue 4 • April 2007
Pages: 287 - 296
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 22, 2004
Accepted: Mar 31, 2006
Published online: Apr 1, 2007
Published in print: Apr 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.