MAUT-Based Dispute Resolution Selection Model Prototype for International Construction Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 5
Abstract
Disputes are common in international projects because of contractual, cultural, and legal factors. The dispute resolution methods currently adopted in international projects are varying, including litigation, arbitration, adjudication, mediation, expert-determination, dispute resolution board, and minitrial. The problem in question is on how to select the most appropriate resolution method that can fit nicely in the nature of the dispute and the disputing parties’ needs. A dispute resolution selection prototype (Model) based on the analytical hierarchy process and multiattribute utility technique (MAUT) is presented in this paper. The Model developed consists of five components: Selection factors, dispute resolution methods, utility factors, relative importance weightings, and user’s preferred weightings. These were based on the quantitative data provided by 41 experts in the field, who were barristers, arbitrators, mediators, and project managers. The Model is considered beneficial to the industry, as it provides construction professionals with a systematic and objective approach in the management of international project disputes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research team members would like to express their appreciation to the Secretary-General of Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) and to the arbitrators/mediators panel members of the HKIAC for their information and participation in this research project. The work described in this paper was partially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. UNSPECIFIEDPolyU-5103/03E).
References
Alhazmi, T., and McCaffer, R. (2000). “Project procurement system selection model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(3), 176–184.
Bevan, A. H. (1992). Alternative dispute resolution, Sweet & Maxwell, London.
Bon, R., and Crosthwaite, D. (2001). “The future of international construction: Some results of 1992–1999 surveys.” Build. Res. Inf., 29(3), 242–247.
Brett, J. M. (2000). “Culture and negotiation.” Int. J. Psychology, 35(2), 97–104.
Brooker, P., and Lavers, A. (1994). “Perceptions of the role of ADR in the settlement of construction dispute: Lessons from the U.S. experience.” Construction Conflict: Management and Resolution, CIB, The Netherlands, 17, 49–69.
Brown, H., and Marriott, A. (1999). ADR: Principles and practice, 2nd Ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London.
Carnevale, P. J., and Choi, D. W. (2000). “Culture in the mediation of international disputes.” Int. J. Psychology, 35(2), 105–110.
Chan, E. H. (1997). “Amicable dispute resolution in the PRC: Implication for foreign-related construction disputes.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(6), 539–548.
Chan, E. H. (2002). “A study of dispute management relevant to disputes arising in international projects involving both European and East Asian cultural factors.” Ph.D. thesis, King’s College, Univ. of London, London.
Chan, E. H. (2003). “Disputology.” International Construction Industry, Construction Research Congress 2003, Hawaii, ASCE Construction Research Council, Reston, Va., 1–9.
Chan, E. H., and Chan, A. P. C. (2001). “Conflict management pertaining to design information in international construction projects.” J. Architectural Manage., 16, 32–57.
Chan, E. H., and Tse, R. (2003). “Cultural considerations in international construction contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(4), 375–381.
Cheung, S. O. (1999). “Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 17(3), 189–94.
Cheung, S. O., Lam, T. I., Leung, M. Y., and Wan, Y. W. (2001). “An analytical hierarchy process bases procurement selection method.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19(4), 427–437.
Cheung, S. O., and Suen, C. H. (2002). “A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20, 557–568.
Cleland, D. (1994). Global project management handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cremades, B. M. (1998). “Overcoming the clash of legal cultures: The role of interactive arbitration.” Arbitration Int., 14(2), 157–172.
David, J. (1988). Dispute resolution for lawyers-overview of range of dispute resolution processes, The Univ. of Sydney, Faculty of Law (Continuing Legal Education), Sydney, Australia.
Edwards, W. (1982). Multi-attribute evaluation-quantitative applications in the social sciences, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
EXPERT CHOICE. (1998). Team expert choice: Advanced group decision support software, Expert Choice Inc., Pittsburgh, Penn.
Fellows, R. F., and Hancock, R. (1994). “Conflict resulting from cultural differentiation: An investigation of the new engineering contract.” CIB Proc., Construction Conflict: Management and Resolution, CIB, The Netherlands, 259–267.
Fenn, P., O’Shea, M., and Davies, E. (1999). Dispute resolution and conflict management in construction: An international review, E&FN Spon, London.
Fong, S. W., and Choi, K. Y. (2000). “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(5), 547–557.
Gold, N. (1991). “Considering dispute resolution: a research prospectus.” A handbook of dispute resolution-ADR in action, edited by K. J. Mackie, Routledge, New York, and Sweet & Maxwell, London.
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., and Roger, N. H. (1992). Dispute resolution-negotiation, mediation, and other processes, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, Mass.
Hibberd, P., and Newman, P. (1999). ADR and adjudication in construction disputes, Blackwell, Oxford.
Hong Kong Airport Authority (HKAA). (2000). “Government airport infrastructure dispute resolution summary (June 30, 2000).” Prepared by the Project Director of HKAA, HKAA, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC). (2003). ⟨http://www.hkiac.org/⟩ (Dec. 10, 2003).
Irwin, H. (1996). Communicating with Asia: Understanding people and customs, Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Performances and value trade-offs, Wiley, New York.
Leung, K. (1987). “Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study.” J. Pers Soc. Psychol., 53(5), 898–908.
Mandelbaum, L. (1984). Alternative justice: The potential for local mediation centres in the state of Washington, Olympia, Wash.
Mawkinney, M. (2001). International construction, Blackwell Science, Oxford, Malden, Mass.
Merna, A., and Bower, D. (1997). Dispute resolution in construction & infrastructure project, Asia Law & Practice Publishing Ltd., Hong Kong.
Miller, F. (1995). The avoidance and resolution of disputes, Ruthtrek Ltd., London.
MYSQL Homepage. (2002). ⟨http://www.mysql.com⟩ (Dec. 10, 2003).
Ofori, G. (1985). “Managing industry development.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 3, 33–42.
Ofori, G. (2000). “Globalization and industry development: Research opportunities.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18, 257–262.
Paek, J. H., Lee, Y. W., and Napier, T. R. (1992). “Selection of design/build proposal using fuzzy-logic system.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(2), 303–317.
PHP. (2002). Professional PHP programming, Wrox Press Ltd., London
Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., and Ross, L. (2004). “Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others.” Psychol. Rev., 111(3), 781–799.
Pryles, M. (2001). “Multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses.” J. Int. Arbitration, 18(2), 159–176.
Raftery, J., Passadilla, B., Chiang, Y. H., Hui, E. C. M., and Tang, B. S. (1998). “Globalization and industry development: Implications of recent developments in the construction sector in Asia.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16, 729–37.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Shilston, A., and Hughes, A. (1997). “SCL Council-international aspects of construction law.” The Building of Construction Law, 10th Annual Construction Conf., Centre Of Construction Law and Management, King’s College, London, Section 1, 1–15.
Singh, A. (1998). “International ADR involving an Indian party.” The Int. Constr. Law Rev., 15(3), 430–452.
Suen, C. H. (2001). “A selection model of dispute resolution systems for construction professionals.” Master thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Tinsley, C. H., and Brett, J. M. (2001). “Managing workplace conflict in the United States and Hong Kong.” Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 85(2), 360–381.
Triandis, H. C. (2000). “Culture and conflict.” Int. J. Psychology, 35(2), 145–152.
Trompenaars, F., and Woolliams, P. (1999). “First-class accommodation.” People Management, International Personnel Development, April 30.
White, A. (1999). “Success through the unwritten law of major construction projects.” Proc., 12th Annual Construction Conf., Centre of Construction Law and Management, King’s College, London.
Woolf, M. R. (1996). Access to justice: The final report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice system in England and Wales, HMSO, London.
York, S. (1996). Practical ADR, Person Professional Ltd., London.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132 • Issue 5 • May 2006
Pages: 444 - 451
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 30, 2003
Accepted: Sep 14, 2005
Published online: May 1, 2006
Published in print: May 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.