Empirical Evaluation of Structural Frame Performance Criteria: Realizing the Potential of Hybrid Concrete Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 3
Abstract
Despite its enormous potential to improve performance, hybrid concrete construction (HCC) is currently underutilized. To demonstrate the benefits of using HCC (sometimes referred to as “mixed” construction) within the industry, it is essential that transparent criteria to assess this structural frame type against alternatives be determined, defined, and evaluated. Following a thorough review of literature in the building performance domain, a survey of U.K. experienced practitioners including clients, engineers, architects, quantity surveyors, and main contractors was conducted to obtain their perceptions regarding the importance of structural frame performance criteria (SFPC). A factor analysis of SFPC revealed seven dimensions, interpreted as “physical form and space,” “construction process,” “long-term sustainability,” “establishing confidence,” “building impact,” “physical appearance,” and “client satisfaction.” These dimensions should improve the decision making process when selecting an appropriate structural frame during early project stages by providing a simple list of performance criteria to be considered. Although these SFPC and dimensions were originally developed to ensure that the benefits of using HCC were apparent during the frame selection process, they are equally applicable to all frame choice comparisons. As such, they may provide a valuable tool for ensuring added value and client satisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The “Simulating the performance of hybrid concrete structures using virtual prototyping techniques” project was funded by the EPSRC and this support is gratefully acknowledged. The academic team comprised the University of Salford (project leader), Loughborough University, and the University of Wolverhampton. The seven collaborating firms are ABC Structures, British Precast Concrete Federation, Curtins Consulting Engineers, Edmund Nuttall, HBG Construction, Reinforced Concrete Council, Trent Precast Concrete Ltd., and Whitby Bird and Partners. Thanks are due to all the members of staff involved.
References
Arditi, D., Ergin, U., and Gunhan, S. (2000). “Factors affecting the use of precast concrete systems.” J. Archit. Eng., 6(3), 79–86.
Arup (2003). “Sustainable project appraisal routine.” ⟨http://www.arup.com/sustainability/services/services.cfm⟩ (May 2, 2003).
Barrett, P. (2001). “Document current business processes and desirable process improvements (work package 3).” Hybrid concrete construction for the UK market: Final report on research into using combinations of in-situ and precast concrete in structural frames to achieve better value for UK customers, C. H. Goodchild, ed., Reinforced Concrete Council, Crowthorne, Berkshire, U.K.
Bottom, C., McGreal, S., and Heaney, G. (1997). “Evaluating office environments using tenant organization perceptions.” Facilities, 15(7/8), 195–203.
Building Research Establishment (BRE). (2000a). “Housing quality indicators.” ⟨http://www.hqiuk.com/⟩ (May 2, 2003).
Building Research Establishment (BRE). (2000b). “The M4I sustainability indicator assessment tool.” ⟨http://www.m4i.org.uk/m4i/toolkits/sustainability/sustain.asp⟩ (May 2, 2003).
Building Research Establishment (BRE). (2001). “BREEAM Offices 2003: Design and procurement assessment checklist.” ⟨http://products.bre.co.uk/breeam/BREEAM_May2003/pdf%20documents/DPPredictionChecklist2003.pdf⟩ (May 6, 2003).
Carpenter, C. L., and Oloufa, A. A. (1995). “Postoccupancy evaluation of buildings and development of facility performance criteria.” J. Archit. Eng., 1(2), 77–81.
CIOB. (1998/1999 ). Directory and handbook 1998/1999, Chartered Building Company Scheme, CIOB publications, Ascot, U.K.
Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, B., and Leaman, A. (2001). “Assessing building performance in use 1: The Probe process.” Build. Res. Inf., 29(2), 85–102.
Construction Industry Council (CIC). (2002). Design quality indicator questionnaire, London.
Construction Industry Council (CIC). (2003). “What is the design quality indicator?” ⟨http://www.dqi.org.uk/index1.htm⟩ (May 6, 2003).
Douglas, J. (1993/1994 ). “Developments in appraising the total performance of buildings.” Struct Surv., 12(6), 10–15.
Dept. of Trade and Industry (DTI), Building Research Establishment (BRE), and Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). (2003). “Environment key performance indicators.” ⟨http://www.cbpp.org.uk/news/article.jsp?id=1716⟩ and ⟨http://www.cbpp.org.uk/resourcecentre/publications/kpi.jsp⟩ (August 21, 2003).
Dun and Bradstreet. (1998). Key British enterprises, London.
Egan, J. (1998). “Rethinking construction.” Rep. Construction Task Force on the Scope for Improving Quality and Efficiency in UK Construction, Dept. of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
Egan, J. (2002). “Accelerating change.” Rep. by Strategic Forum for Construction chaired by Sir John Egan, London.
Elliott, K. S. (2002). “Precast concrete in mixed construction: A state-of-the-art review.” FIB Commission 6—Task Group TG2, FIB Bulletin No. 19.
Estates Gazette. (1999). “Directory of property development and investment companies.” August, 66–69, Estates Gazette Group, London.
Freedman, S. (2001). “Design factors influencing the aesthetics of architectural precast concrete.” PCI J., 46(2), 44–60.
Gann, D. M., Salter, A. J., and Whyte, J. K. (2003). “Design quality indicator as a tool for thinking.” Build. Res. Inf., 31(5), 318–333.
Gibb, A. G. F. (1999). Off-site fabrication: Prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularization, Whittles Publishing, Caithness, Scotland.
Glass, J. (2002). Best practice guidance on hybrid concrete construction, work stage 2: Practitioner interviews, research report, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, U.K.
Glass, J. (2005). “A best practice process model for hybrid concrete construction.” Constr. Manage. Econom., in press.
Glass, J., and Baiche, B. (2001). “Perceptions of hybrid concrete construction in the UK construction industry.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 8(1), 67–77.
Goodchild, C. H. (1995). Hybrid concrete construction: Combining structural materials for speed, quality and economy in buildings, British Cement Association, Berkshire, U.K.
Goodchild, C. H. (2001). Hybrid concrete construction for the UK market: Final report on research into using combinations of in-situ and precast concrete in structural frames to achieve better value for UK customers, Reinforced Concrete Council, Crowthorne, Berkshire, U.K.
Hill, L. ed. (1999). Municipal year book 1999 and public service directory, Vol. 1, Functions and Officers, Newman Books, London.
Idrus, A., and Newman, J. (2003). “IFESS: A computer tool to aid structural engineers at the conceptual design stage.” Constr. Innovation, 3(3), 127–143.
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Working Group. (2000). Key Performance Indicators report for the Minister for Construction, Dept. of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
Kim, J. O., and Mueller, C. W. (1978a). “Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues.” Quantitative applications in the social sciences series No. 14, Sage Publications, London.
Kim, J. O., and Mueller, C. W. (1978b). “Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it.” Quantitative applications in the social sciences series No. 13, Sage Publications, London.
Knutt, E., and Osborne, J. (1998). “Consultants league table: top 100 architects.” Building Magazine, 2 (October), 50–52.
Kompass. (1999–2000 ). Register of British industry and commerce, Kompass Publisher Ltd., Surrey, UK.
Latham, M. (1994). “Constructing the team.” Final Rep. of the Government/Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangement in the United Kingdom Construction Industry, HMSO, Department of Environment, London.
Liu, A. M. M. (1999). “Residential satisfaction in housing estates: A Hong Kong perspective.” Autom. Constr., 8(4), 511–524.
Martilla, J. A., and James, J. C. (1977). “Importance-performance analysis.” J. Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.
Norusis, M. J. (1994). SPSS professional statistics 6.1, SPSS Inc., Chicago.
Preiser, W. F. E. (1983). “The habitability framework: a conceptual approach towards linking human behaviour and physical environment.” Des. Stud., 4(2), 84–91.
Preiser, W. F. E. (1989). “Towards a performance-based conceptual framework for systematic POEs.” Building evaluation, W. F. E. Preiser, ed., Plenum, New York.
Preiser, W. F. E. (1995). “Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better.” Facilities, 13(11), 19–28.
Preiser, W. F. E., and Schramm, U. (2002). “Intelligent office building performance evaluation.” Facilities, 20(7/8), 279–287.
Reading Production Engineering Group (RPEG). (2001). “Barriers to hybrid concrete construction.” Hybrid concrete construction for the UK market: Final report on research into using combinations of in-situ and precast concrete in structural frames to achieve better value for UK customers, C. H. Goodchild, ed., Reinforced Concrete Council, Crowthorne, Berkshire, U.K.
Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA). (1998). Directory of practices, RIBA Publications, London.
Sanders, P. A., and Collins, B. L. (1995). “Post-occupancy evaluation of the Forrestal building.” Rep. prepared for U.S. Department of Energy by U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg, Md., ⟨http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build95/PDF/b95080.pdf⟩ (May 2, 2003).
Scott, J. S. (1991). Dictionary of civil engineering, 4th Ed. Penguin, London.
Soetanto, R., Proverbs, D. G., and Holt, G. D. (2001). “Achieving quality construction projects based on harmonious working relationships: clients’ and architects’ perceptions of contractor performance.” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 18(5), 528–548.
Sustainability Working Group. (2001). “Environmental performance indicators for sustainable construction.” ⟨http://www.m4i.org.uk/rc/publications/reports/m4i_epi_report2001.pdf⟩ (May 2, 2003).
Toole, T. M. (1994). “Task and environmental uncertainty and the adoption of technological innovations by home builders.” PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132 • Issue 3 • March 2006
Pages: 278 - 290
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 29, 2003
Accepted: Aug 16, 2005
Published online: Mar 1, 2006
Published in print: Mar 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.