TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2005

Managing Owner’s Risk of Contractor Default

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 9

Abstract

The objective of the study presented in this paper is to provide owners with a decision-making mechanism that will free them from automatically taking the typical “transfer the risk to a surety” option and will allow them to make intelligent and economical decisions that include retaining or avoiding the risk of contractor default. The methodology involves using artificial neural network (ANN) and a genetic algorithm (GA) training strategies to predict the risk of contractor default. Prediction rates of 75 and 88% were obtained with the ANN and GA training strategies, respectively. The model is of relevance to owners because once the likelihood of contractor default is predicted and the owner’s risk behavior is established, the owner can make a decision to retain, transfer, or avoid the risk of contractor default. It is of relevance to surety companies too as it may speed up the process of bonding and of reaching more reliable and objective bond/not bond decisions. The comparative use of the ANN and GA training strategies is of particular relevance to researchers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Arditi, D., Koksal, A., and Kale, S. (2000). “Business failures in the construction industry.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 7(2), 120–132.
Argenti, J. (1976). Corporate collapse, McGraw-Hill, London.
Boussabaine, A. H. (1996). “The use of artificial neural networks in construction management: A review.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 14(5), 427–436.
Bruderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., and Zeigler, R. (1992). “Survival chances of newly founded business organizations.” Am. Sociol. Rev., 52(2), 227–242.
Burger, R. (2003). “Contingency, quantifying the uncertainty.” Cost Eng., 45(8), 12–17.
Daily, C. M. (1995). “The relationships between board composition and leadership structure and bankruptcy reorganization outcomes.” J. Manage. Eng., 21(6), 1041–1056.
Fredrickson, J. W. (1984). “The comprehensiveness of strategic decision process: Extension, observations, future directions.” Acad. Manage J., 27(3), 454–466.
Fredrickson, J. W., and Iaquinto, A. L. (1989). “Inertia and creeping rationality in strategic decision process.” Acad. Manage J., 32(3), 516–542.
Fredrickson, J. W., and Mitchell, T. R. (1984). “Strategy decision process: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment.” Acad. Manage J., 27(2), 399–423.
Hua, G. B. (1996). “Residential construction demand forecasting using economic indicators: A comparative study of artificial neural networks and multiple regression.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 14(1), 25–34.
Kale, S., and Arditi, D. (1998). “Business failures: liabilities of newness, adolescence and smallness.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 458–464.
Keasey, K., and Watson, K. (1987). “Non-financial symptoms and the prediction of small company failure: A test of Argenti’s hypothesis.” J. Bus. Finance Account., 14(3), 335–354.
Koksal, A., (2002). “Predicting the development of decline in construction companies.” PhD thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago.
Koksal, A., and Arditi, D. (2004). “An input output model for business failures in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Res., 5(1), 1–16.
Mak, S., and Picken, D. (2000). “Using risk analysis to determine construction project contingencies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(2), 130–136.
Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M. A., and Kotulic, A. G. (1995). “Rationality in strategic decision process, environmental dynamism and firm performance.” J. Manage. Eng., 21(5), 913–929.
Russell, J. S., and Jaselskis, E. J. (1992). “Predicting construction contractor failure prior to contract award.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 118(4), 791–811.
Russell, J. S., and Zhai, H. (1996). “Predicting contractor failure using stochastic dynamics of economic and financial variables.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(2), 183–191.
Severson, G. D., Russell, J. S., and Jaselskis, E. J. (1994). “Predicting contract surety bond claims using contractor financial data.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 120(2), 405–420.
Touran, A. (2003). “Probablistic model for cost contingency.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129(3), 280–284.
Willenbrock J. H., (1973). “Utility function determination for bidding models.” J. Constr. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 99(C01), 133–153.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131Issue 9September 2005
Pages: 973 - 978

History

Received: Nov 3, 2003
Accepted: Mar 10, 2005
Published online: Sep 1, 2005
Published in print: Sep 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Obaid Saad Al-Sobiei [email protected]
Lieutenant Colonel/Engineer, Head of Technical Support Section, GDMW/MODA, P.O. Box 46539, Riyadh 11542, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected]
David Arditi, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Illinois Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Chicago, IL 60616. E-mail: [email protected]
Visiting Scholar, Illinois Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Chicago, IL 60616. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share