Utility-Function Model for Engineering Performance Assessment
This article is a reply.
VIEW THE ORIGINAL ARTICLEThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 5
Abstract
Engineering and design activities constitute a critical link in a project’s life cycle. Thus, an efficient project control system requires an instrument to measure and assess engineering performance among different projects. In conventional industry practices, the measurement of engineering performance is usually tied to the production of design documents during the detailed design phase of the project. Realizing the far-reaching impacts of engineering activities, researchers in the past have investigated other comprehensive measures of engineering performance that address the entire project life cycle. As part of a study for the Construction Industry Institute, this particular research employs a multiple attribute utility function method for the collective assessment of engineering performance in construction projects. The paper begins with a summary of previous studies in the area of engineering performance measurement and assessment. Afterwards, the concept of engineering performance is thoroughly explained. The paper then reviews the background and basic theories of using utility functions in assessing engineering performance, along with an illustrative example of the functionality of this approach. The paper goes on to show the development of the utility function model for the industrial construction sector through expert opinion and real project data. The use of the model is further illustrated in the assessment of total and relative engineering performance. Lastly, conclusions of this study are drawn and potential future work is pointed out.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to thank the members of the CII research team on engineering productivity measurement for their support and help throughout this study.
References
Alarcon, L. F., and Ashley, D. B. (1996). “Modeling project performance for decision making.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(3), 265–273.
Baird, B. F. (1989). Managerial decisions under uncertainty: An introduction to the analysis of decision making, Wiley, New York.
Barrie, D. S., and Paulson, B. C. (1992). Professional construction management: Including CM, design-construct and general contracting, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bolte, K. (1986). “Productivity in engineering disciplines.” National Productivity Review, Spring, 134–141.
Burati, J. L., and Farrington, J. J. (1987). “Costs of quality deviations in design and construction.” Research Rep. No. SD-29, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
Chalabi, A. F., Beaudin, B. J., and Salazar, G. F. (1987). “Input Variables Impacting Design Effectiveness.” Research Rep. No. SD-26, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
Chang, L. M., Georgy, M. E., and Zhang, L. (2001). “Engineering productivity measurement.” Research Rep. No. RR156-11, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
Clemen, R. T. (1991). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis, Duxbury Press, Belmont, Calif.
Eldin, N. N. (1991). “Management of engineering/design phase.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 117(1), 163–175.
Fergusson, K. J., and Teicholz, P. M. (1996). “Achieving industrial facility quality: Integration is key.” J. Manage. Eng., 12(1), 49–56.
Georgy, M. E., Chang, L. M., and Walsh, K. (2000). “Engineering performance in industrial construction.” Proc., Construction Congress VI, ASCE, Reston, Va., 917–927.
Mollaghasemi, M., and Pet-Edwards, J. (1997). “Making multiple-objective decisions.” Technical briefing, IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
Post, N. M. (1998). “Building teams get high marks.” ENR, 240(19), 32–39.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, and resources allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Tucker, R. L., and Scarlett, B. R. (1986). “Evaluation of design effectiveness.” Research Rep. No. SD-16, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
Wuellner, W. W. (1990). “Project performance evaluation checklist for consulting engineers.” J. Manage. Eng., 6(3), 270–281.
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131 • Issue 5 • May 2005
Pages: 558 - 568
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 5, 2002
Accepted: Sep 29, 2003
Published online: May 1, 2005
Published in print: May 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.