TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 1, 2005

Paradigm Shift in Construction Education is Vital for the Future of Our Profession

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 5

Abstract

In 2001, a survey found that 87% of engineering professors in the United States spend the entire class time lecturing to a passive group of students material that is copied down and never looked at again. This paper presents the results of scientific inquiry and keen observations all leading to the same conclusion: engineering education has to reform itself. Presently, almost all engineering students learn best doing lots of homework (50%) and theoretical study (25%) are accommodated by lectures, homework, and rote-problem tests. Regrettably, an overwhelming number of the creative students do not learn this way and fail. Learning as a process needs to be put at the heart of education moving us away from the traditional educational enterprise. The presented data benefits researchers and practitioners in that they highlight the urgency of the issue and show how the proposed paradigm shift is underpinned by our understanding of how people learn.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgment

The work presented in this paper was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDEEC-0212150.

References

Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2000). Engineering Criteria 2000http://www.abet.org⟩.
Anderson, J. A., and Adams, M. (1992). “Acknowledging the learning styles of diverse student populations: Implications for instructional design.” Teaching for Diversity, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, L. L. B. Border and N. V. N. Chism, eds., Vol. 49, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 19–33.
Beasley, D. E., Huey, C. O., Wilkes, J. M., and McCormick, K. (1995). “Cognitive styles and implications for the engineering curriculum.” Proc., ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education ’95, Session 4d3, Pittsburgh.
Bernold, L. E., Bingham, W. L., McDonald, P. H., and Attia, T. M. (2000). “Influence of learning type oriented teaching on academic success of engineering students.” J. Eng. Educ., 191–199.
Bonwell, C. C., and Sutherland, T. E. (1996). “The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom.” Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty, T. E. Sutherland and C. C. Bowell, eds., New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 67, Jossey-Bas, San Francisco, 3–16.
Brown, C. S. (1981). Alexander Meiklejohn: Teacher of freedom, Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute, Berkeley, Calif.
Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F. (1987). “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education.” AAHE Bull., 39, 3–7.
Davis, S., and Botkin, J. (1994). The monster under the bed: How business is mastering the opportunity of knowledge for profit, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Hermann, N. (1990). The creative brain, Brain Books, Lake Lure, N.C.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Learning.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Kolb, D. A., and Fry, R. (1975). “Toward an applied theory of experiential learning.” Theories of group process, C. Cooper, ed., Wiley, London.
McCarthy, B. (1987). The 4MAT system, teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques, Excel Inc., Barrington, Ill.
McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Yi-Guang, L., and Smith, D. A. F. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature, Regents of the University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). “A nation at risk.” Rep. to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
O’Banion, T. (1997). A learning college for the 21st century, American Association of Community Colleges, Washington, D.C.
Perelman, L. J. (1992). School’s out: Hyperlearning, the new technology and the end of education, William Morrow, New York.
Smith, B. L. (1993). “Creating learning communities.” Liberal Educ., 79(4), 32–39.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). “The context of postsecondary education.” The Condition of Education, NCES 2001072, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 74–84.
Wingspread Group on Higher Education. (1993). An American imperative: Higher expectations for higher education, The Johnson Foundation, Racine, Wis.
Woods, D. R. (1998). “Three trends in teaching and learning.” Chem. Eng. Educ., 32(4), 296–301.
Zuber-Zkerrett, O. (1992). Action learning in higher education, Kogan-Page, London.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131Issue 5May 2005
Pages: 533 - 539

History

Received: Aug 5, 2003
Accepted: Jun 7, 2004
Published online: May 1, 2005
Published in print: May 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Leonhard E. Bernold, M.ASCE [email protected]
PhD, Dept. of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27695. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share