Finance-Based Scheduling: Tool to Maximize Project Profit Using Improved Genetic Algorithms
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 4
Abstract
Contractor’s ability to procure cash to carry out construction operations represents a crucial factor to run profitable business. Bank overdrafts have always been the major source to finance construction projects. However, it is not uncommon that bankers set a limit on the credit allocated to an established overdraft. Bankers’ interest rates and consequently contractors’ financing costs are basically determined based on the allocated credit limits. Furthermore, project indirect costs are directly proportional to the project duration which is affected by the allocated credit limit. Thus, the credit limit affects project financing costs and indirect costs which in turn affect project profit. However, finance-based scheduling produces financially executable schedules at specified credit limits while maintaining the demand of time minimization. Thus, finance-based scheduling provides a tool to control the credit requirements. This control enables contractors to negotiate lower interest rates which reduce financing costs. Thus, finance-based scheduling enables contractors to reduce project indirect costs and financing costs. This paper utilizes genetic algorithm’s technique to devise finance-based schedules that maximize project profit through minimizing financing costs and indirect costs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Au, T., and Hendrikson, C. (1986). “Profit measures for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 112(2), 273–286.
Chan, W., Chua, K., and Kannan, G. (1996). “Construction resource scheduling with genetic algorithms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(2), 125–132.
Cheng, Y. (1993). “QSB+: Quantitative systems for business plus.” Version 3.0, A quantitative systems software, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Elazouni, A., and Gab-Allah, A. (2004). “Finance-based scheduling of construction projects using integer programming.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 15–24.
Feng, C., Liu, L., and Burns, S. (1997). “Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 11(3), 184–189.
Leu, S., and Yang, C. (1999). “GA-based multicriteria optimal model for construction scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(6), 420–427.
Li, H., Cao, J., and Love, P. (1999). “Using machine learning and GA to solve time-cost trade-off problems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 347–353.
Li, H., and Love, P. (1997). “Using improved genetic algorithms to facilitate time-cost optimization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(3), 233–237.
Li, H., and Love, P. (1998). “Site-level facilities layout using genetic algorithms.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 12(4), 227–231.
Haidar, A., Naoum, S., Howes, R., and Tah, J. (1999). “Genetic algorithms application and testing for equipment selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(1), 32–38.
Hegazy, T. (1999). “Optimization of resource allocation and leveling using genetic algorithms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3), 167–175.
Navon, R., and McCrea, A. (1997). “Selection of optimal construction robot using genetic algorithm.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 11(3), 175–183.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 25, 2003
Accepted: Apr 29, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2005
Published in print: Apr 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.