TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 2005

Trade-off between Safety and Cost in Planning Construction Site Layouts

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 11

Abstract

Planning construction site layouts involves identifying the positions of temporary facilities on site, and accordingly it has a significant impact on the safety and efficiency of construction operations. Although available models are capable of minimizing the travel cost of resources on site, they do not consider safety as an important and separate objective in the optimization of site layouts. This paper presents the development of an expanded site layout planning model that is capable of maximizing construction safety and minimizing the travel cost of resources on site, simultaneously. The model incorporates newly developed concepts and performance criteria that enable the quantification of construction safety and travel cost of resources on site. The present model is developed in three main phases: (1) formulating decision variables and optimization objectives in this site layout planning problem; (2) identifying and satisfying all practical constraints in this optimization problem; and (3) implementing the model as a multiobjective genetic algorithm. An application example is analyzed to illustrate the use of the model and demonstrate its capabilities in optimizing construction site layouts and generating optimal trade-offs between safety and travel cost of resources on site.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided for this research project by the National Science Foundation under the NSF CAREER award number NSFCMS 0238470 and the NSF NSFITR 0427089.

References

Anumba, C., and Bishop, G. (1997). “Importance of safety considerations in site layout and organization.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 24(2), 229–236.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2004). “Numbers and rates of fatal occupational injuries by industry division, 2002.” ⟨http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0001.pdf⟩ (Jan. 2004).
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2005). “Injuries, illnesses, and fatalities.” ⟨http://www.bls.gov/iif/⟩ (March 2005).
Dawood, N., and Marasini, R. (2001). “Stockyard layout management for precast concrete products using simulation.” Proc., CIB-W78 Int. Conf., IT in Construction in Africa, Mpumalanga, South Africa, 26/1–13.
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratab, A., and Meyarivan, T. (2000). “A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II.” KanGAL Rep. 200001, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Hamiani, A. (1989). “Knowledge representation for the site layout problem.” Sixth Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering, New York, 283–289.
Harmanani, H., Zouein, P., and Hajar, A. (2000). “An evolutionary algorithm for solving the geometrically constrained site layout problem.” Proc., 8th ASCE Int. Conf. on Comput. Civ. and Build. Eng. (ICCCBE-VIII), Stanford University, 1442–1449.
Hegazy, T., and Elbeltagi, E. (1999). “EvoSite: Evolution-based model for site layout planning.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 13(3), 198–206.
Hiller, K., and Schneider, C. (2001). “OSHA raises the bar for steel construction safety.” Struct. Eng., 2, 36–38.
Islier, A. A. (1998). “A genetic algorithm approach for multiple criteria facility layout design.” Int. J. Prod. Res., 36(6), 1549–1569.
Kumara, S. R. T., Kashyap, R. L., and Moodie, C. L. (1988). “Application of expert systems and pattern recognition methodologies to facilities layout planning.” Int. J. Prod. Res., 26(5), 905–930.
Li, H., and Love, P. E. D. (1998). “Site-level facilities layout using genetic algorithms.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 12(4), 227–231.
Loughborough University and the University of Manchester Institute of Science Technology (LU and UMIST). (2003). “Causal factors in construction accidents.” Research Rep. No. 156, Health and Safety Executive, Norwich, U.K.
Mawdesley, M. J., Al-jibouri, S. H., and Yang, H. (2002). “Genetic algorithms for construction site layout in project planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(5), 418–426.
Means, R. S. (2005). Building construction cost data 2005, R. S. Means Company Inc., Kingston, Mass.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2000). “Worker health chartbook, 2000.” DHHS (NIOSH) 2000-127, Atlanta.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2003a). A dangerous worksite: The World Trade Center, Occupational Safety and Health Administration Publications, Washington, D.C.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2003b). “Occupational Safety and Health Administration website.” ⟨http://www.osha.gov/archive/oshinfo/priorities/crane.html⟩ (August 2003).
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2003c). “Safety and health regulations for construction.” 29 Code of federal regulation, Part 1926, Washington, D.C.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2004a). “Anatomy of confined spaces in construction.” ⟨http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/cspace2.html⟩ (March 2004).
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2004b). “OSHA News Release.” ⟨http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&p_id=985⟩ (March 2004).
Shayan, E., and Al-hakim, L. (1999). “Improved methods in solutions of unequal-sized facilities layout problems by genetic algorithms.” Advanced manufacturing processes, systems, and technologies (AMPST99), Professional Engineering Publishing, U.K., 133–141.
Tam, K. Y. (1992). “Genetic algorithms, function optimisation, and facility layout design.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 63, 322–346.
Tam, C. M., Tong, T. K. L., Leung, A. T. W., and Chiu, G. W. C. (2002). “Site layout planning using nonstructural fuzzy decision support system.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(3), 220–231.
Tawfik, H. M., and Fernando, T. (2001a). “A simulation environment for construction site planning.” 5th Int. Conf. Information Visualisation, London, U.K.
Tawfik, H. M., and Fernando, T. (2001b). “A parallel genetic algorithm for optimising construction site layouts.” IASTED Int. Conf. Applied Simulation and Modelling, Marbella, Spain.
Tommelein, I. D., Levitt, R. E., and Hayes-Roth, B. (1992). “SightPlan model for site layout.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(4), 749–766.
Tommelein, I. D., Levitt, R. E., Hayes-Roth, B., and Confrey, T. (1991). “SightPlan experiments: Alternate strategies for site layout design.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 5(1), 42–63.
Tommelein, I. D., and Zouein, P. P. (1993). “Interactive dynamic layout planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(2), 266–287.
University of Ottawa (UO). (2003). “Construction site safety guide.” ⟨http://www.uottawa.ca/services/immeub/safety.htm⟩ (December 2003).
Yeh, I.-C. (1995). “Construction-site layout using annealed neural network.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 9(3), 201–208.
Zouein, P. P., and Tommelein, I. D. (1999). “Dynamic layout planning using a hybrid incremental solution method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(6), 400–408.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131Issue 11November 2005
Pages: 1186 - 1195

History

Received: Jun 9, 2004
Accepted: Apr 29, 2005
Published online: Nov 1, 2005
Published in print: Nov 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Khaled El-Rayes, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Ahmed Khalafallah
PhD Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share