A Fuzzy Decision Framework for Contractor Selection
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 1
Abstract
Contractor selection is the process of selecting the most appropriate contractor to deliver the project as specified so that the achievement of the best value for money is ensured. Construction clients are becoming more aware of the fact that selection of a contractor based on tender price alone is quite risky and may lead to the failure of the project in terms of time delay and poor quality standards. Evaluation of contractors based on multiple criteria is, therefore, becoming more popular. Contractor selection in a multicriteria environment is, in essence, largely dependent on the uncertainty inherent in the nature of construction projects and subjective judgment of decision makers (DMs). This paper presents a systematic procedure based on fuzzy set theory to evaluate the capability of a contractor to deliver the project as per the owner’s requirements. The notion of Shapley value is used to determine the global value or relative importance of each criterion in accomplishing the overall objective of the decision-making process. The research reported upon forms part of a larger study that aims to develop a fuzzy decision model for construction contractor selection involving investigating multiple criteria selection tendencies of construction clients, relationship among decision criteria, and construction clients’ preferences of criteria in the contractor selection process. An illustration with a bid evaluation exercise is presented to demonstrate the data requirements and the application of the method in selecting the most appropriate contractor for the project under uncertainty. The proposed model is not intended to supplant the work of decision-making teams in the contractor selection process, but rather to help them make quality evaluations of the available candidate contractors. One major advantage of the proposed method is that it makes the selection process more systematic and realistic as the use of fuzzy set theory allows the DMs to express their assessment of contractors’ performance on decision criteria in linguistic terms rather than as crisp values.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Barrie, D., and Paulson, B. (1992). Professional construction management, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Diekmann, J. E. (1981). “Cost-plus contractor selection: A case study.” J. Technical Councils ASCE, 107(TC1), 13–25.
Fong, P. S.-W., and Choi, S. K.-Y. (2000). “Final contractor selection using analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18, 547–557.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1997). “Criteria for contractor selection.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15, 19–38.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1998). “Contractor selection using multi-criteria utility theory: An additive model.” Build. Environ., 33(2), 148–164.
Helmer, T. F., and Taylor, R. L. (1977). “The evaluation of contractor management during source selection.” Proc., AIIE Spring Annual Conf., Dept. of Economics, Geography and Management, USAF Academy, Color.
Hipel, K. W., Radford, K. J., and Fang, L. (1993). “Multiple participant-multiple criteria decision making.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 23, 1184–1189.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1995). “Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions.” Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manage., 1(3), 139–148.
Hong Kong Housing Authority. (1994). “PASS: Performance assessment scoring system.” Housing Dept., Hong Kong.
Hwang, C.-L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, Springer, New York.
Jaselskis, E. J. (1988). “Achieving construction projects through predictive discrete choice model.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Jaselskisl, E. J., and Russell, J. S. (1991). “An efficient structured approach for selection of most promising construction contractors.” Proj. Manage. J., 12(4), 31–39.
Kaufmann, A., and Gupta, M. M. (1988). Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kaufmann, A., and Gupta, M. M. (1991). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic theory and application, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Khosrowshahi, F. (1999). “Neural network model for contractor’s prequalification for local authority projects.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 6(3), 315–328.
Klir, G. J., and Folger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1996). “Contractor evaluation and selection: A Hong Kong perceptive.” Build. Environ., 31(3), 273–282.
Lam, K. C., Hu, T., Ng, S. T., Skitmore, M., and Cheung, S. O. (2001). “A fuzzy neural network approach for contractor prequalification.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19, 175–188.
Mahdi, I. M., Riley, M. J., Fereig, S. M., and Alex, A. P. (2002). “A multi-criteria approach to contractor selection.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 9(1), 29–37.
Merna, A., and Smith, N. J. (1990). “Bid evaluation for the U.K public sector construction contracts.” Proc., Inst. of Civil Engineers Part I: Design and Construction, Vol. 88, Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 91–105.
Ministry of Public Building and Works (MPBW). (1964). “The placing and management of contractor for building and civil engineering works.” Banwell Rep., Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
Moore, M. J. (1985a). “Selecting a contractor for fast track projects. Part 1: Principles of contractor evaluation.” Plant Eng., 39(12), 74–75.
Moore, M. J. (1985b). “Selecting a contractor for fast track projects. Part 2: Quantitative evaluation method.” Plant Eng., 39(18), 54–56.
Nguyen, V. U. (1985). “Tender evaluation by fuzzy sets.” Constr. Eng. Manage., 111(3), 231–243.
Pongpeng, J., and Liston, J. (2003). “TenSeM: A multicriteria and multidecision-makers’ model in tender evaluation.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 21(1), 21–30.
Roy, B. (1989). “Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision in decision models.” Math. Comput. Modell., 12, 1245–1254.
Russell, J. S., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1988). “Decision criteria in contractor prequalification.” J. Manage. Eng., 4(2), 148–164.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.” J. Math. Psychol., 15(1), 234–281.
Samelson, N. M., and Levitt, R. E. (1982). “Owner’s guidelines for selecting safe contracts.” J. Constr. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 108(4), 617–623.
Schmucker, K. J. (1984). Fuzzy sets, natural language computation, and risk analysis, Computer Science Press, New York.
Shapley, L. S. (1953). “A value for n-person games.” Contribution to the theory of games, Vol. II, H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, eds., Annals of mathematics studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 307–317.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control., 8, 338–353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1973). “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning.” ERL-M 411, Berkeley, Calif.
Zimmerman, H.-J. (1985). Fuzzy set theory—and its application, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Hingham, Mass.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131 • Issue 1 • January 2005
Pages: 62 - 70
Copyright
© 2004 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 13, 2003
Accepted: Jan 12, 2004
Published online: Jan 1, 2005
Published in print: Jan 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.