Improving Concessionaire Selection Protocols in Public/Private Partnered Infrastructure Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 5
Abstract
A critical contributor to the success of a public/private partnered (PPP) infrastructure project is the selection of the right private-sector partner, the concessionaire, who would provide the best overall deal throughout the build-operate-transfer (BOT)[build/operate/transfer] development process. This paper proposes a core concessionaire selection protocol that incorporates public procurement principles, best-value selection approach, competitive selection process, and multicriteria tender evaluation. Key pointers for an improved concessionaire selection protocol are discussed and analyzed by drawing experience and learning lessons from worldwide PPP practices. These include improved project brief and tender documents, formulation of a best-value selection methodology, determination of suitable criteria and methods for prequalification and tender evaluation, capital structure (equity-to-debt ratio), financial models, and potential improvements in different stages of the concessionaire selection process. Relevant results of a questionnaire survey of international PPP expert opinions on an enhanced concessionaire selection protocol are also presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abdul-Aziz, A.-R. (2001). “Unraveling of BOT scheme: Malaysia’s Indah Water Konsortium.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(6), 457–460.
2.
Berry, C. (1991). “Criteria for successful project financing.” Project Finance Yearbook 1991/1992, Bedfordshire, U.K., 15–20.
3.
Birgonul, M.T., and Ozdogan, I. (1998). “A proposed framework for governmental organization in the implementation of build-operate-transfer (BOT) model.” Proc., 14th Annual ARCOM 1998, Conf., W. Hughes, ed., ARCOM, Reading, U.K., 517–526.
4.
Blackwell, M. (2000). The PFI/PPP and property, Chandos, Oxford, U.K.
5.
Construction Industry Council (CIC). (1998). Constructors’ key guide to PFI, Thomas Telford, London.
6.
Gransberg, D. D., ands Ellicott, M. A. (1997). “Best value contracting criteria.” Cost Eng., 39(6), 31–34.
7.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1997). “Criteria for contractor selection.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15, 19–38.
8.
Herbsman, Z. J. (1995). “A+B bidding method—hidden success story for highway construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(4), 430–437.
9.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (1998). Practical guide to PFI for higher education institutions, Bristol, U.K.
10.
HM Treasury, (1997). A step by step guide to the PFI procurement process, London.
11.
Kumaraswamy, M.M., and Walker, D.H. T. (1999). “Chapter: Multiple performance criteria for evaluation construction contractors.” Procurement systems in construction—A guide to best practice, E&FN Spon, London, 228–251.
12.
Levy, S.M. (1996). Build, operate, transfer, Wiley, New York.
13.
Merna, A., and Smith, N.J. (1996). “Guide to the preparation and evaluation of build-own-operate-transfer (BOOT) project tenders.” Asia Law and Practice.
14.
Miller, J.B. (1999). “Applying multiple project procurement methods to a portfolio of infrastructure projects.” Procurement systems: A guide to best practice in construction, E&FN Spon, London.
15.
Miller, J. B., Garvin, M. J., Ibbs, C. W., and Mahoney, S. E. (2000). “Toward a new paradigm: Simultaneous use of multiple project delivery methods.” J. Manage. Eng., 16(3), 58–67.
16.
Morledge, R., and Owen, K. (1997). “Developing a methodological approach to the identification of factors critical to success in privatized infrastructure projects in the UK.” Proc., CIB W92 and CIB TG 23 Joint Symp.: Profitable Partnering in Construction Procurement, Int. Organisation for Standerdization, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 487–498.
17.
Mustafa, A. (1999). “Public private procurement system: The critical issues in implementing PFI.” Proc. CIB and W55 Joint Triennial Symp.—Customer Satisfaction: A Focus for Research and Practice, Int. Organisation for Standerdization, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 247–255.
18.
Palaneeswaran, E. (2000). “Contractor selection systems for design-build projects”, PhD thesis, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
19.
Palaneeswaran, E., and Kumaraswamy, M.M. (1999). “Dynamic contractor prequalification.” Proc., 15th Annual ARCOM Conf., W. Hughes, ed. Reading, U.K. vol. 2, 615–624.
20.
Tiong, R. L. K., Yeo, K. T., and McCarthy, S. C. (1992). “Critical success factors in winning BOT contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(2), 217–228.
21.
Treasury Committee (1996). The Private Finance Initiative: The government’s response to the 6th rep., HMSO, London.
22.
Whitfield, D. (2001). Public services or corporate welfare: Rethinking the nation state in the global economy, Pluto Press, London.
23.
Zhang, X.-Q. (2004a). “Concessionaire selection: Methods and criteria.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.1302, 235–244.
24.
Zhang, X.-Q. (2004b). “Critical success factors for public private partnerships in infrastructure development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. (in press).
25.
Zhang, X.-Q., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2001). “Hong Kong Experience in managing BOT projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(2), 154–162.
26.
Zhang, X.-Q., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002). “Critical financial issues in packaging concession infrastructure projects.” Journal of Building and Construction Management, 7(1), 28–35.
27.
Zhang, X.-Q., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Zheng, W., and Palaneeswaran, E. (2002). “Concessionaire selection for BOT tunnel projects in Hong Kong.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(2), 155–163.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 2004
Published in print: Oct 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.