TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 15, 2004

Incident Causation Model for Improving Feedback of Safety Knowledge

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 4

Abstract

In order for the construction industry to improve its poor safety performance it needs to learn from its mistakes and put the lessons learned to good use. This need calls for effective feedback mechanisms that can transmit information derived from incident investigation to be utilized in safety planning. The feedback should be at two levels; first, feedback to the Safety Management System that had failed, and second, feedback to the safety planning of future projects. The first level of feedback can be achieved by basing the investigation on an incident investigation model that explicitly identifies system failure. The second level of feedback can be achieved if both incident investigation and safety planning share the same incident causation model, such that the information from each process can be retrieved and utilized in the other process smoothly. One prerequisite to fulfill the two levels of feedback is the development of an incident causation model. In this paper, the modified loss causation model (MLCM), which is able to meet the above-mentioned purposes, will be presented. The MLCM is developed based on an extensive literature review and application on 140 actual accident cases obtained from Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower, Occupational Safety Department. In this paper, the model’s application will be demonstrated through a case study, which involves codification of investigation information based on an actual incident report, and a safety planning process based on a hypothetical case.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdelhamid, T. S., and Everett, J. G.(2000). “Identifying root causes of construction accidents.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(1), 52–60.
Ang, H. S., and Tang, W. H. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design Vol. 1-Basic principles, Wiley, New York.
Bird, F. E., and Germain, G. L. (1996). Practical loss control leadership, Det Norske Veritas, Ga.
British Standards Institute (BSI). (1996). “Guide to occupational health and safety management systems.” BS 8800, London.
British Standards Institute (BSI). (2000). “Occupational health and safety management systems-Guidelines for the implementation of OHSAS 18001.” OHSAS 18002, London.
Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people, Simon and Schuster, London.
Goh, Y. M., and Chua, D. K. H. (2002). “Identification of factors causing fatal construction accidents.” Proc., CIB W99 3rd Int. Conf. on Implementation of Safety and Health on Construction Sites, S. Rowlinson, ed., University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 69–76.
Haddon, W. (1980). “The basic strategies for reducing damage from hazards of all kinds.” Hazard prevention, September/October, 8–12.
Heinrich, H. W. (1939). Industrial accident prevention, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Henderson, J., Whittington, C., and Wright, K. (2001). “Accident investigation-The drivers, methods and outcomes.” HSE CRR 344/2001, HSE, UK.
Hinze, J. (1997). Construction safety, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Johnson, W. G. (1980). MORT Safety Assurance System, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Kartam, N. A., and Bouz, R. G.(1998). “Fatalities and injuries in the Kuwaiti construction industry.” Accid. Anal Prev., 30(6), 805–814.
Kerr, W.(1950). “Accident proneness of factory departments.” J. Appl. Psychol., 34, 167–170.
Kerr, W.(1957). “Complementary theories of safety psychology.” J. Soc. Psychol., 43, 3–9.
Ministry of Manpower (MOM). (2001). Ministry of Manpower Official Website, 〈http://www.gov.sg/mom/menubar/public/pmain.htm〉 (Feb. 3, 2002).
National Safety Council. (1997). Accident facts, Itasca, Ill.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Reason, J. (1993). “Managing the management risk: New approaches to organisational safety.” Reliability and safety in hazardous work systems, B. Wilpert and T. Qvale, eds, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, U.K., 7–22.
Sanders, M. S., and Shaw, B. (1988). Research to determine the contribution of system factors in the occurrence of underground injury accidents, Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh.
Suraji, A., Duff, A. R., and Peckitt, S. J.(2001). “Development of causal model of construction accident causation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(4), 337–344.
Tam, C. M., and Fung, I. W. H.(1998). “Effectiveness of safety management strategies on safety performance in Hong Kong.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16(1), 49–55.
Whittington, C., Livingston, A., and Lucas, D. A. (1992). “Research into management organizational and human factors in the construction industry.” HSE CRR No. 45/1992, HSE Books, Sudbury, Suffolk.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130Issue 4August 2004
Pages: 542 - 551

History

Received: Apr 17, 2002
Accepted: May 12, 2003
Published online: Jul 15, 2004
Published in print: Aug 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

D. K. H. Chua, M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore 119260.
Y. M. Goh
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore 119260.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share