Electronic-Based Procedure for Managing Unbalanced Bids
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 3
Abstract
Construction lump sum lowest bid procurement is one of the most prevalent methods of awarding construction contracts. For a lump sum bidding practice in Taiwan, after the lowest bidder is awarded a construction project contract, the contractual unit price for each cost item is taken as the product of the owner’s estimated unit price and a discounting ratio equal to the total bid price divided by the owner’s project cost estimate. This owner-based approach is inequitable because the bidder is denied the right to allocate the risks associated with the costs of performing the work. In U.S. practice, while the unit prices submitted by the bidder are usually considered as the contractual ones, unbalanced bids may occur. This work presents a bidder-based quantitative procedure, built on an electronic-based bidding process for effectively and efficiently supporting reviewing and adjusting the bidder’s proposed unit prices for a lump sum procurement project. The advantages of this procedure include that the unit prices electronically obtained from the owner and all qualified bidders are included in analyses during unit-price evaluation, and that rules for unit-price adjustment along with maintaining the total contractual price are included. The novel procedure has been successfully applied to several construction projects in Taiwan and the results have been greatly appreciated by both governments and contractors.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ahmad, I.(1990). “Decision-support system for modeling bid/no-bid decision problem.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(4), 595–608.
Carr, R. I.(1983). “Impact of number of bidders on competition.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 109(1), 61–73.
Carr, R. I.(1987). “Competitive bidding and opportunity costs.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 113(1), 151–165.
Chua, D. K. H., and Li, D.(2000). “Key factors in bid reasoning models.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(5), 349–357.
Chua, D. K. H., Li, D. Z., and Chan, W. T.(2001). “Case-based reasoning approach in bid decision making.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(1), 35–45.
Crowley, L. G.(1997). “Robust statistical estimators for use within competitive bid data.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(1), 53–63.
Crowley, L. G., and Hancher, D. E.(1995a). “Risk assessment of competitive procurement.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(2), 230–237.
Crowley, L. G., and Hancher, D. E.(1995b). “Evaluation of competitive bids.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(2), 238–245.
Dozzi, S. P., AbouRizk, S. M., and Schroeder, S. L.(1996). “Utility-theory model for bid markup decisions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(2), 119–124.
Fayek, A.(1998). “Competitive bidding strategy model and software system for bid preparation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(1), 1–10.
Hendrickson, C., and Au, T. (1998). Project management for construction, fundamental concepts for owners, engineers, architects and builders, web version 〈http://www.ce.cmu.edu/∼cth/pmbook/〉, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Ioannou, P. G., and Leu, S. S.(1993). “Average-bid method—competitive bidding strategy.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(1), 131–147.
Moselhi, O., Hegazy, T., and Fazio, P.(1993). “DBID: Analogy-based DSS for bidding in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(3), 466–479.
Public Construction Commission (PCC). (1999). Operational regulations for adding electronic estimating file in bid documents for public construction projects (in Chinese), Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan, Taiwan 〈http://www.pcc.gov.tw/big5/index.html〉.
Skitmore, M., Drew, D., and Ngai, S.(2001). “Bid-spread.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(2), 149–153.
Tong, Y., and Lu, Y.(1992). “Unbalanced bidding on contracts with variation trends in client-provided quantities.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 10, 69–80.
Wang, W-C.(2002). “SIM-UTILITY: Model for project ceiling price determination.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(1), 76–84.
Wanous, M., Boussabaine, A. H., and Lewis, I.(2000). “To bid or not to bid: A parametric solution.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18, 457–466.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130 • Issue 3 • June 2004
Pages: 455 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 20, 2001
Accepted: Dec 4, 2002
Published online: May 14, 2004
Published in print: Jun 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.