Fundamentals of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes in Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 128, Issue 5
Abstract
With the surge of increasingly complex and fast-track construction projects, disputes are inevitable. Skills in dispute resolution should be part of the tool kit of any practitioner in a managerial position. The perceived shortcomings of litigation and arbitration, with their concomitant rise in costs, delays, and adversarial relationships, have encouraged the rapid growth of alternative dispute-resolution processes, namely, conciliation, mediation, adjudication, and other hybrid processes that have been widely used and well received by the Hong Kong construction industry. For example, mediation is now an integral part of most conditions of contracts published by the government of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region. However, the last decade evidenced the incorporation of increasingly complex dispute-resolution clauses in construction contracts, typically involving several alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques and arbitration arranged in sequential tiers. These dispute-resolution procedures render the supposedly more economic and speedy ADR process ineffective. In this study, a hierarchical model is developed to organize attributes of ADR processes. This presentation fits with the use of analytical hierarchy process methodology by a panel of experts to prioritize ADR process attributes. The top-ranked attributes identified as critical include, among others, preservation of relationships, enforceability, neutrality, and consensus. The experts also suggested means to establish these attributes. By focusing on these critical attributes, the dispute-resolution process can be kept simple and effective.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Alhazmi, T., and McCaffer, R.(2000). “Project procurement system selection model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(3), 176–84.
Bevan, A. H. (1992). Alternative dispute resolution, Sweet & Maxwell, London.
Brooker, P., and Lavers, A. (2000a). “Appropriate ADR and the CPR rules.” International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, Working Commission 103 (W103) Construction Conflict: Avoidance and Resolution, Manchester, U.K.
Brooker, P., and Lavers, A. (2000b). “Appropriate ADR—Identifying features of construction disputes which affect their suitability for submission to ADR.” ICLR, vol. 17, part 2.
Brown, H., and Marriott, A. (1999). ADR principles and practice, 2nd Ed., Sweet & Maxwell, London.
Cheung, S. O.(1999a). “Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 17(3), 189–194.
Cheung, S. O.(1999b). “The alternative dispute movement in the construction industry in Hong Kong.” Aust. Dispute Resolution J., 10(2), 98–112.
Cheung, S. O., Lam, T. I., Leung, M. Y., and Wan, Y. W.(2001). “An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19(4), 427–437.
Chua, D. K. H., Kog, Y. C., and Loh, P. K.(1999). “Critical success factors for different project objectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3), 142–150.
David, J. (1988). “Dispute resolution for lawyers—Overview of range of dispute resolution processes.” Univ. of Sydney, Faculty of Law, Continuing Legal Education, Sydney, Australia.
Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking construction, Dept. of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, HMSO, London.
Fenn, P., and Gameson, R. (1992). Construction conflict management—Proc., 1st Int. Construction Management Conf., E&FN Spon, London.
Fong, S. W., and Choi, K. Y.(2000). “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(5), 547–57.
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., and Roger, N. H. (1992). Dispute resolution—Negotiation, mediation, and other processes, Little, Brown, Canada.
Hibberd, P., and Newman, P. (1999). ADR and adjudication in construction disputes, Blackwell Science, London.
Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC). (2000). “Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre homepage: Services and facilities.” 〈http://www.hkiac.org〉 (July 7, 2001).
Kaplan, N., Spruce, J., and Cheng, T. Y. W. (1991). Hong Kong arbitration cases and materials, Butterworths, Hong Kong.
Kumaraswamy, M. M.(1997). “Common categories and causes of construction claims.” Constr. Law J., 13(1), 21–34.
Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the team: Final report by Sir Michael Latham; Joint review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the United Kingdom construction industry, HMSO, London.
Merna, A., and Bower, D. (1997). Dispute resolution in construction and infrastructure projects, Asia Law and Practice Publishing, Hong Kong.
Pengilley, W.(1990). “Alternative dispute resolution: The philosophy and the need.” Aust. Dispute Resolution J., 1(2), 81–95.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T. L. (1988). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation, McGraw-Hill, London.
Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G. (1991). Prediction, projection and forecasting, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Shen, Q., Lo, K. K., and Wang, Q.(1998). “Priority setting in maintenance: A modified multi-attribute approach using analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16(6), 693–702.
Team Expert Choice: Advanced group decision support software. (1998). Expert Choice Inc., Pittsburgh.
Walker, A. (1996). Project management in construction, Blackwell Science, London.
Wall, C. (2000). What’s new in member countries: Hong Kong—Monograph of practice and procedure in Hong Kong, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, Working Commission 103 (W103) Construction Conflict: Avoidance and Resolution, Manchester, U.K.
York, S. (1996). Practical ADR, Pearson, London.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 25, 2001
Accepted: Oct 11, 2001
Published online: Sep 13, 2002
Published in print: Oct 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.