Unraveling of BOT Scheme: Malaysia's Indah Water Konsortium
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 127, Issue 6
Abstract
Malaysia's privatization program, which began in 1983, has been praised by some, while others have been less impressed. This paper describes the return of a privatized infrastructure after seven years to government hands after it had been relinquished to the private sector. Right from the beginning the privatized national sewerage scheme was plagued with controversy—from selection of a concession company, charge structure, and performance to ownership changes. The award of the infrastructure facility was made in the absence of competition. The charge structure accepted by the government was never revealed completely to the public. Inefficiencies and management blunders aggravated public sentiment. The change of ownership three times in as many years gave the impression of industrialists out to make quick money at the expense of public welfare. Despite copious government assistance, Indah Water Konsortium, the concession holder, became infeasible as an independent operating company. This case study provides salutary lessons of what to avoid when structuring a privatization arrangement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abdul-Aziz, A-R. ( 1998). “Malaysia's privatization of infrastructure facilities: A call for fine-tuning.” Kajian Malaysia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16(1&2), 21–52.
2.
Adam, C., Cavendish, C. W., and Mistry, P. S. ( 1992). Adjusting privatization: Case studies from developing countries, Currey, London.
3.
Clifford, J. ( 1993). “Pipelines to profit: Malaysia plans privatized sewerage network.” Far Eastern Economic Review, Hong Kong, 22 July.
4.
Crawford, P. ( 1988). “Privatization of infrastructure development.” Proc., Conf. on Privatization in Malaysia: Practical Aspects and Implications, Association of Merchant Bankers of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
5.
Euromoney. ( 1985). “Why Malaysia means business.” February.
6.
Glade, W. ( 1989). “Privatization in rent-seeking societies.” World Development, 17(5), 673–382.
7.
Goh, W., and Jomo, K. S. ( 1995). “Efficiency and consumer welfare.” Privatizing Malaysia: Rents, rhetorics, realities, K. S. Jomo, ed., Westview Press, Oxford, U.K., 154–171.
8.
Ho, J. ( 1995). “The making of a prime stock.” Malaysian Business, Kuala Lumpur, 18–29.
9.
Jomo, K. S. ( 1995). “Overview.” Privatization Malaysia: Rents rhetorics, realities, K. S. Jomo, ed., Westview Press, Oxford, U.K., 42–60.
10.
Kohli, H. ( 1995). Infrastructure development in East Asia and the Pacific, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
11.
Kuan, L. Y. ( 1996). “Research on build-operate-transfer project structure: With reference to case study on national sewerage systems privatization project, Indah Water Konsortium Ltd.” BSc thesis, School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang (in Malay).
12.
Leeds, R. ( 1989). “Malaysia: Genesis of a privatization transaction.” World Development, 17(5), 741–757.
13.
Lieberman, I. W. ( 1993). “Privatization: The theme of the 1990s: An overview.” Columbia J. World Business, 28(2), 8–17.
14.
Lim, K. S. ( 1987). The RM62 billion North-South Highway scandal, Democratic Action Party, Kuala Lumpur.
15.
Mahathir, M. ( 1988). “Keynote address.” Proc., Conf. on Privatization in Malaysia: Practical Aspects and Implications, Association of Merchant Bankers of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
16.
Molz, R. ( 1990). “Privatization in developing countries.” Columbia J. World Business, 25(1&2), 17–24.
17.
Naidu, G. ( 1995). “Infrastructure.” Privatizing Malaysia: Rents, rhetorics, realities, K. S. Jomo, ed., Westview Press, Oxford, U.K., 199–218.
18.
Nellis, J., and Kikeri, S. ( 1989). “Public enterprise reform: Privatization and the World Bank.” World Development, 17(5), 659–672.
19.
Nixson, F. ( 1995). “Enterprise reform and economic restructuring in transitional economies.” Privatization policy and performance, P. Cook and C. Kirkpatrick, eds., Prentice-Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, 101–112.
20.
Price, A. D. F. ( 1995). Financing international projects, International Labor Office, Geneva.
21.
Schwartzs, G. ( 1995). “Privatization in Eastern Europe.” Privatization policy and performance, P. Cook and C. Kirkpatrick, eds., Prentice-Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, 31–47.
22.
Tiong, R. L. K. (1995). “Competitive advantage of equity in BOT tender.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 121(3), 282–289.
23.
Tsuruoka, D. ( 1993). “Where there's muck: Malaysia's Berjaya group poised to win sewer contract.” Far Eastern Economic Review, Hong Kong, April 1.
24.
World Bank. ( 1992). Privatization: The lessons of experience, Country Economics Department, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
25.
World Bank. ( 1995). Infrastructure in East Asia: Towards a new public-private sector partnership, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
26.
World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER). ( 1992). Private investment in infrastructure—The mobilization of equity capital, Helsinki, Finland.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 127 • Issue 6 • December 2001
Pages: 457 - 460
History
Received: Sep 22, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.