Comparison of Two Maintainability Programs
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 127, Issue 3
Abstract
Research by the Construction Industry Institute Maintainability Research Team investigated how maintainability is being incorporated into the project delivery process. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two formal maintainability programs drawn from that research. The programs differ in terms of application and project type and size, in addition to the organization leading the implementation (owner-led versus contractor-led). This paper identifies program attributes contributing to effective maintainability programs. These have been grouped into five categories: (1) corporate commitment; (2) program resources; (3) maintainability planning; (4) maintainability implementation; and (5) program updating. Additionally, the comparative analysis provides readers with insights into different applications used to implement maintainability.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Blanchard, B. S., Verma, D., and Peterson, E. L. ( 1995). Maintainability: A key to effective serviceability and maintenance management, Wiley, New York.
2.
Publ. 34-1, Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
3.
Construction Industry Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
4.
Russell, J. S., and Gugel, J. G. (1993). “Comparison of two corporate constructability programs.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(4), 769–784.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: May 4, 2000
Published online: Jun 1, 2001
Published in print: Jun 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.