Defining Triangular Probability Distributions from Historical Cost Data
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 126, Issue 1
Abstract
During the development of an automated cost estimating system, several factors led to the selection of the triangular probability-density function to model historical construction costs. The triangular-density function is customarily used when function parameters are directly estimated by experts. A typical example is for estimating activity durations by identifying a minimum value, a most likely value, and a maximum value. These values are then used to construct triangular-density functions to represent uncertain activity durations. For this work, however, it was necessary to estimate parameters of the triangular-density function using historical cost data. A methodology was developed to generate test data and compare three methods of parameter estimation—maximum likelihood, moment matching, and least-squares curve-fitting techniques. It is concluded that optimized moment matching and least-squares techniques produce more accurate parameter estimates, while maximum likelihood estimation yields less accurate results. It is further concluded that the least-squares minimization method always performed as well as or better than the optimized moment matching technique and was therefore selected as the method of choice for the project.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AbouRizk, S. M., Halpin, D. W., and Wilson, J. R. (1994). “Fitting beta distributions based on sample data.” J Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE,120(2)288–305.
2.
Ahmad, I. ( 1992). “Contingency allocation: A computer-aided approach.” Trans., AACE, Morgantown, W.Va., F.5.1–F.5.5.
3.
Ang, A., and Tang, W. H. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. Wiley, New York.
4.
Chau, K. W. (1995). “The validity of the triangular distribution assumption in Monte Carlo simulation of construction costs: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong.” Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 13(January), 15–21.
5.
Curran, M. W. ( 1989). “Range estimating contingencies with confidence.” Trans., AACE, Morgantown, W.Va., B.7.1–B.7.4.
6.
Knoke, J. R., and Spittler, J. R. ( 1990). “Direct range estimating for change orders.” Trans., AACE, Morgantown, W.Va., M.3.1–M.3.11.
7.
Mlakar, P. F., and Bryant, L. M. (1992). “Direct range cost estimating.” Cost Engrg., 34(12), 7–12.
8.
Rowland, P. W., and Curran, M. K. ( 1991). “Range estimating in value engineering.” Trans., AACE, Morgantown, W.Va., G.3.1–G.3.5.
9.
Spooner, J. E. (1974). “Probabilistic estimating.” J Constr. Div., ASCE,100(1)65–77.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Mar 23, 1998
Published online: Jan 1, 2000
Published in print: Jan 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.