Incentive/Disincentive Contracts: Perceptions of Owners and Contractors
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 124, Issue 5
Abstract
Incentive/disincentive (I/D) contracting has developed from basic cost- and profit-sharing arrangements between an owner and a contractor. To motivate the contractor to put in an extra effort to realize one or more project objectives of an accelerated, costly, and complex undertaking, the owner may offer an award to the contractor. The owner may also threaten the contractor with a penalty if the objectives are not met. This paper reviews the fundamental incentive/disincentive arrangements in contracting literature. Then, results are reported of a survey conducted on a sample of Illinois DOT highway contracts that included I/D provisions. The survey investigates whether there exists an agreement or disagreement between IDOT's and the contractors' perceptions of I/D contract provisions. The findings reveal how I/D contract milestones are established, how they are executed, what kind of work practices the contractor uses to fulfill I/D targets, and how the contracting parties perceive I/D contracts' effectiveness as opposed to non-I/D contracts. Certain issues pointed out by the respondents as problematic and in need of further refinement in I/D applications are also highlighted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abu Hijleh, S. F., and Ibbs, C. W.(1989). “Schedule-based construction incentives.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 115(3), 430–443.
2.
Androkovich, R. A.(1990). “Relative risk aversion, incentive effects, and risk sharing.”Atlantic Economic J., 18(4), 38–41.
3.
Antill, J. M., and Woodhead, R. W. (1990). Critical path methods in construction practice, 4th Ed., Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
4.
Arditi, D., Khisty, C. J., and Yasamis, F.(1997). “Incentive/disincentive provisions in highway contracts.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 123(3), 302–307.
5.
Ashley, D. B., and Mathews, J. J. (1985). “Analysis of construction contract change clauses.”Tech. Rep. No. UTCEPM-85-2, University of Texas, Austin, Tex.
6.
Ashley, D. B., and Workman, B. W. (1985). “Incentives in construction contracts.”Tech. Rep. No. UTCEPM-85-3, University of Texas, Austin, Tex.
7.
Bernhard, R. H.(1988). “On the choice of the sharing fraction for incentive contracting.”Engrg. Economist, 33(3), 181–190.
8.
Bradley, C. E., and McCuiston, C.(1972). “The rationale for incentive contracting.”Decision Sci., 3, 15–30.
9.
Brumm, H. J.(1992). “Incentives in incentive contracting: an application of the MIMIC Model.”Appl. Economics, 24, 337–345.
10.
Cohen, S. I., and Loeb, M. P.(1990). “On the optimality of incentive contracts in the presence of joint costs.”Int. J. Ind. Organization, 8, 405–416.
11.
Conover, W. J. (1980). Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd Ed., John Wiley, New York, N.Y.
12.
“Contractual arrangements.” (1982). Constr. Ind. Cost Effectiveness Project Rep. A-7, Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
13.
DeMong, R. F. (1978). “The effectiveness of incentive contracts: what research tells us.”Nat. Contract Mgmt. Quart. J., December, 12–22. Design Memorandum No. 90-53 . (1990). Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Ill.
14.
Finchum Jr., J. A. (1972). “Expectation of contract incentives.”Naval Res. Logistics Quart., A(2), 389–397.
15.
Fisher, I. N.(1969). “An evaluation of incentive contracting experience.”Naval Res. Logistics Quart., 16(1), 63–83.
16.
Herbsman, Z. J.(1995). “A + B bidding method—hidden success story for highway construction.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 121(4), 430–437.
17.
Herbsman, Z. J., Chen, W. T., and Epstein, W. C.(1995). “Time is money: innovative contracting methods in construction.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 121(3), 273–281.
18.
Ibbs, C. W., and Abu-Hijleh, S. F. (1988). “Unique features of construction contract incentive plans.”Rep. No. 12, Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
19.
Ibbs, C. W., et al. (1986). “Determining the impact of various construction contract types and clauses on project performance.”Tech. Rep. No. 20,, Vol. 1, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
20.
“I/D for early completion.” (1989). Tech. Advisory T 5090.10, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Incentive contracting guide . (1969). Department of Defense and NASA, Washington, D.C.
21.
Jaraiedi, M., Plummer, R. W., and Aber, M. S.(1995). “Incentive disincentive guidelines for highway construction contracts.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 121(1), 112–120.
22.
Reichelstein, S.(1992). “Constructing incentive schemes for government contracts: an application of agency theory.”The Accounting Rev., 67(4), 712–731.
23.
Rosenfeld, Y., and Geltner, D.(1991). “Cost-plus and incentive contracting: some false benefits and inherent drawbacks.”Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 9, 481–492.
24.
Scherer, F. M. (1964). “The theory of contractual incentives for cost reduction.”Quart. J. Economics, May, 257–280.
25.
Stukhart, G.(1984). “Contractual incentives.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 110(1), 34–42.
26.
Yasamis, F. (1994). “Effectiveness of incentive/disincentive clauses in contracts,” MS thesis, Civ. and Arch. Engrg. Dept., Illinois Inst. of Technol., Chicago, Ill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 124 • Issue 5 • September 1998
Pages: 361 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1998
Published in print: Sep 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.