Linear Scheduling Model: Development of Controlling Activity Path
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 124, Issue 4
Abstract
There are several reasons why linear scheduling techniques have not been applied widely to construction projects even though they have been identified as very useful. If we consider the capabilities and the widespread use of critical-path method (CPM) in the construction industry, some of the reasons why linear scheduling is not popular become evident. There is an abundance of highly developed CPM computer applications available today. These applications provide a rich set of capabilities such as resource and cost allocation, progress reporting, and schedule updating, plus the generation of a multitude of reports and graphics. There are no comparable applications for linear scheduling. The reason for the shortage of applications is that linear scheduling typically has been regarded as a visual technique lacking the analytical qualities of the CPM of scheduling. Fundamental to linear scheduling's lack of an analytical perspective is its inability to determine a critical path. This paper documents a method by which a controlling activity path can be determined in a linear schedule. This fundamental ability further forms the basis for the determination of float for noncontrolling activities and provides a means of statusing and updating linear schedules.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chrzanowski, E. N., and Johnston, D. W.(1988). “Application of linear scheduling.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(4), 476–491.
2.
Harmelink, D. J. (1995). “Linear scheduling model: The development of a linear scheduling model with micro computer applications for highway construction project control,” PhD thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
3.
Johnson, D. W.(1981). “Linear scheduling method for highway construction.”J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 107(2), 247–261.
4.
Rowings, J. E., and Harmelink, D. J. (1993). “A multi-project scheduling procedure for transportation projects—final report Part I.”HR339, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Iowa.
5.
Rowings, J. E., and Harmelink, D. J. (1994). “A multi-project scheduling procedure for transportation projects—final report Part II.”HR339, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Iowa.
6.
Vorester, M. C., Beliveau, Y. J., and Bafna, T. (1992). “Linear scheduling and visualization.”Transp. Res. Rec. 1351, 32–39.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1998
Published in print: Jul 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.