Identifying Component Variability of End Product Specification Tests
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 124, Issue 2
Abstract
In recent years there has been a move away from methods and material specification for pavement projects and toward end product specifications (EPS) as part of a general improvement in quality assurance programs. Typically, the EPS are based on the average of a number of measurements on a given day, and the between-test variance and the between-days variance are ignored. This paper presents a methodology for identifying the components of the total variability, estimating the variance associated with each component, and identifying the responsibility of each component to overall variance. The total variability and individual component variability may be used for a number of quality assurance applications—for example, identifying potential problem areas in the construction of a particular pavement, as input to new end product specifications that account for the variability in the measured results, or for aiding in setting appropriate bonus/penalty schedules, which are typically used in conjunction with EPS. The statistical approach adopted in this paper is a nested analysis of variance and the methodology will be tested on five years of data from an EPS program in the Province of Alberta, Canada. Data are from Marshal density and field density tests of asphalt concrete, although the procedure may be used for any EPS field test.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alberta Transportation and Utilities (AT&U). (1994). Standard specifications for highway and airport construction, 3rd Ed., AT&U, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
2.
Ang, A., and Tang, W. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Volume 1, basic principles. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
3.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Forfylow, R. W., Englot, R., Nodwell, M., and Boychuk, M. (1994). “End product specification—a contractor and consultant's perspective.”Proc., 1994 Int. Rd. Fed. Conf., Alberta Transportation and Utilities, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
5.
Kempthorne, O., and Folks, J. L. (1971). Probability, statistics and data analysis. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
6.
National Highway Institute (NHI). (1991). “Principles of writing highway construction specifications,”FHWA-HI-91-016, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
7.
Palsat, D., and McMillan, C. (1994). “End product specifications—eight years of experience by Alberta Transportation and Utilities.”Proc., 1994 Int. Rd. Fed. Conf., Alberta Transportation and Utilities, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
8.
Rilett, L. R.(1998). “Effect of variability on end product specifications.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., 124(2), 139–145.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1998
Published in print: Mar 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.