Delay Claims in U.K. Contracts
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
Contract conditions in both the United Kingdom and the United States are sufficiently similar to allow common generic delay claim scenarios to be recognized, but there are important differences in the extent of legal precedent for assessing such claims. In the United States recognized procedures have been developed to allow critical path method (CPM) to be adopted in this area, while in the United Kingdom the situation is much less clear. It is true that U.K. professionals will generally recognize that CPM will be useful in dealing with delay claims, but there is little evidence that a standard approach has been accepted. A survey was conducted by the writer to discover how U.K. claims for delay were being prepared (by the contractors) and how they were being assessed (by the supervisors). Because of the complexity of this area, the study was approached in a number of ways. This paper presents conclusions concerning attitudes towards such claims and information about the mechanisms that are being adopted to prepare and evaluate them.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abrahamson, M.W. (1979). “Engineering law and the I.C.E.”Contracts, 4th Ed., Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London, England.
2.
Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). (1991). Conditions of contract. 6th Ed., Thomas Telford, London, England.
3.
Kraiem, Z. M., and Diekmann, J. E.(1987). “Concurrent delays in construction projects.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113(4), 591–602.
4.
Powell-Smith, V., and Stephenson, D. (1989). Civil engineering claims. BSP Professional Books, London, England.
5.
Wickwire, J. M., and Smith, R. F.(1974). “The use of critical path method techniques in contract claims.”Public Contract Law J., 7(1), 1–45.
6.
Wickwire, J. M., Hurlbut, S. B., and Lerman, L. J.(1989). “The use of critical path method techniques in contract claims: issues and developments 1974 to 1988.”Public Contract Law J., 18(2), 338–391.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1997
Published in print: Sep 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.