Owner-Contractor Relationships on Contaminated Site Remediation Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 122, Issue 4
Abstract
Contaminated site remediation projects have characteristics that distinguish them from conventional construction projects, including substantial regulatory oversight and significant uncertainty about subsurface conditions and the effectiveness of the remedial technology chosen. The unusual features of remediation projects suggests that nontraditional or innovative contracting mechanisms may be beneficial. Sixty completed remediation projects were studied to identify and document the effects of different project management structures and contracting strategies on project outcomes. Survey results indicated that changes in scope, budget overruns, delays, disputes, and change orders are common on remediation projects. Flexible project management strategies, such as turnkey and partnering arrangements, and flexible contracting schemes, such as cost plus fee, were found to be better suited to accommodate such changes. Turnkey and design/construct project structures had the best performance overall of the management structures reported. Mechanisms to promote partnering and team building contributed significantly to project success as defined by budget and schedule.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1991). “In search of partnering excellence.”Spec. Publ. No. 17-1, Partnering Task Force, Austin, Tex.
2.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1993). “Team building: improving project performance.”Publ. No. 37-1, Proj. Team Build. Task Force, Austin, Tex.
3.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1995). “Environmental remediation management: an eight-step process.”Spec. Publ. No. 48-2, Envir. Remediation Task Force, Austin, Tex.
4.
Manuele, V. O. (1993/94). “Alternative contracting strategies for controlling costs and avoiding performance disputes on remediation projects.”Remediation, (Winter), 23–41.
5.
Ruff, C. M., Dzombak, D. A., and Hendrickson, C. T. (1995). “Evaluation of owner-contractor relationships on contaminated site remediation projects.”Source Document 106, Constr. Industry Inst. (CII), Austin, Tex.
6.
Russell, M., Colglazier, E. W., and English, M. R. (1991). “Hazardous waste remediation: the task ahead.” Rep., Waste Mgmt. Res. and Educ. Inst., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1996
Published in print: Dec 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.