More-Stable Owner-Contractor Relationships
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 122, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper presents an updated and enhanced version of a study conducted by the task force of the Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA) on “More-Stable Contractor Relationships.” The purpose of the study was to explore the current contracting philosophies, strategies, methods of execution, tendering processes, and techniques. The purpose of the study was also to identify the problem areas and determinants of success in the execution of projects, and to share these findings with the industry for further improvement. We have found that the industry is somewhat complacent and appears reluctant to embrace change. There is a preoccupation with contract award on the basis of lowest lump-sum bid although most recognize that this often results in a higher end price for the product. There is a need for improvement in the areas of life-cycle costing, contracting process, risk management, teamwork, trust, and cooperation, as well as communication and the use of quality management principles. There are ample opportunities to be more progressive. The survey and subsequent evaluation concluded that any initiatives to formulate more stable contractor relationships must come from construction owners.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Construction Industry Institute. (1990). “Potential for construction industry improvement volume I and II.”Document Nos. SD61 and SD62, Houston, Tex.
2.
Construction Industry Institute. (1993). “Cost-trust relationship.”Publ. No. 24-1, CII Contracting Phase II Taskforce, Houston, Tex.
3.
Hartman, F. T. (1993). “Construction dispute resolution through an improved contracting process in the Canadian context,” PhD thesis, Loughborough Univ. of Technology, Loughborough, U.K.
4.
Hartman, F. T.(1994). “Reducing or eliminating construction claims: a new contracting process (NCP).”Proj. Mgmt. J., 25(3), 25–31.
5.
McKim, R. A.(1992). “Risk behavior of contractors: a Canadian study.”Proj. Mgmt. J., 22(5), 51–55.
6.
Schleifer, T. C. (1990). Construction contractor's survival guide. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
7.
Snelgrove, P. N. (1994). “Risk allocation in lump-sum contracts,” MEng. thesis, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
8.
Thompson, P. A., and Perry, J. G. (1992). “Engineering construction risks.” Science and Engineering Research Council Thomas Telford Services, Limited, U.K.
9.
Turner, R. J., McLauchlin, J. J., Thomas, R., and Hastings, S. C. (1994). “A vision of project management in 2020.”Proc., 12th Internet World Congr. on Proj. Mgmt., J. Lereim, ed., Oslo, Norway.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1996
Published in print: Mar 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.