Fuzzy Modus Ponens Deduction Technique for Construction Scheduling
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper presents a new method to estimate the duration of construction activities. A model, Activity Duration Decision Support System (ADDSS), was developed. This model employs the fuzzy modus ponens deduction (FMPD) technique to evaluate the impact of different factors on activity duration. The linguistic values of these factors are represented by angular fuzzy set models. The technique described in this paper allows a scheduler to partially match an evidence with a rule. The use of angular models demonstrates the use of a single and relatively simple fuzzy logic formula. The technique we developed does not require the scheduler to understand the underlying concept of fuzzy logic. In fact, one needs only to input an assessment of factors that may affect the completion of an activity. At this stage, ADDSS interfaces with the CA‐SuperProject scheduling package. ADDSS was also developed to export and import data to and from the CA‐SuperProject. Both the logic operations and angular models of ADDSS are elaborated. A step‐by‐step procedure using ADDSS is presented, followed by case studies demonstrating the implementation of ADDSS in hypothetical and real construction projects. These cases show the practicality and applicability of ADDSS.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ayyub, B. M., and Haldar, A. (1984). “Project scheduling using fuzzy set concepts.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 110(2), 189–204.
2.
CA‐Super‐Project for MS‐DOS. Reference manual and scheduler's guide. (1990). Computer Associates International, San Jose, Calif.
3.
Crandall, K. C., and Woolery, J. C. (1982). “Schedule development under stochastic scheduling.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 108(2), 321–329.
4.
Giles, R. (1976). “Lukasiewicz logic and fuzzy set theory.” Int. J. Man‐Machine Studies, Vol. 8, 313–328.
5.
Hadipriono, F. C. (1987). “Approximate reasoning for falsework safety assessment.” Struct. Safety, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4(2), 131–140.
6.
Hadipriono, F. C., and Chang, K. S. (1988). “Knowledge base development for international construction operations.” Civ. Engrg. System, Vol. 5, 220–227.
7.
Hadipriono, F. C., and Sun, K. (1990). “Angular fuzzy set models for linguistic values.” Civ. Engrg. Systems, 7(3), 148–156.
8.
Hendrickson, C., Martinelli, D., and Rehak, D. (1987). “Hierarchical rule‐based activity duration estimation.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 113, 288–301.
9.
Levitt, R. E., and Kunz, J. C. (1985). “Using knowledge of construction and project management for automated schedule updating.” Proj. Mgmt. J., 6(5), 57–76.
10.
Wu, W. K. (1991). “Fuzzy modus ponens deduction technique for determining the duration of construction activities,” MS thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
11.
Yao, J. T. P. (1980). “Damage assessment of existing structures.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 106(4), 785–799.
12.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Information and Control, 8, 58–64.
13.
Zadeh, L. A. (1983). “The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert system.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 199–227.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120 • Issue 1 • March 1994
Pages: 162 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 12, 1992
Published online: Mar 1, 1994
Published in print: Mar 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.