Noncontractual Methods of Integration on Construction Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 118, Issue 2
Abstract
Several progressive engineering and construction firms are now working to overcome the well‐recognized problems of disintegration. One critical problem is the adverse consequences for technological advancement. Familiar and new forms of contracts, such as design‐build and partnerships, are one way to increase integration. Organizational and information integration offer other alternatives to improve coordination and efficiency. Based on investigations of several recent construction innovations, this paper describes four noncontractual means of integration on construction projects: (1) Owner's leadership; (2) the long‐term relationship; (3) employing integration champions; and (4) the professionalism of project participants. Providing real‐world examples of construction innovations, the paper describes how each method helps overcome disintegration. The conclusions and practical applications highlight the need for new forms of integration, the feasibility of using noncontractual means, and the significant benefits of these means. The applications include actions by government agencies, owners, contractors, and educational institutions to increase the frequency and benefits of noncontractual integration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barrie, D. S., and Paulson, B. C., Jr. (1984). Professional construction management. 2 Ed., McGraw‐Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
2.
“Integrating construction resources and technology into engineering” (1982). A report on the construction industry cost effectiveness project, Report B‐1, Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
3.
Cassimatis, P. J. (1969). Economics of the construction industry. The National Conference Board, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Competition policy and the professions. (1985). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
5.
“Design‐construct makes a comeback.” (1988). Engrg. News Record, 220(15), 72.
6.
From vision to reality: Managing innovation. (1985). Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.
7.
Garnham, W. J. H. (1983). Building control by legislation: The UK experience. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
8.
Harper, R. H. (1985). Victorian building regulations. Mansell Publishing Limited, London, U.K.
9.
Howard, H. C., Levitt, R. E., Paulson, B. C., Jr., Pohl, J. G., and Tatum, C. B. (1989). “Computer integration: Reducing fragmentation in the AEC industry.” J. Comput. Civ. Engrg., 3(1), 18–32.
10.
Knowles, C., and Pitt, P. (1972). The history of building regulation in London 1189–1972. Architectural Press, London, U.K.
11.
Moore, W. E. (1970). The professions: Roles and rules. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, N.Y.
12.
Nam, C. H., and Tatum, C. B. (1988). “Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology.” Proc. Constr. Mgmt. And Economics, E. & F. N. Spon Ltd., London, U.K., 133–148.
13.
Nam, C. H., and Tatum, C. B. (1989). “Toward understanding product innovation process in construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 115(4), 517–534.
14.
O'Connor, J. T., and Tucker, R. L. (1986). “Industry project constructability improvement.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 112(1), 69–82.
15.
Paulson, B. C., Jr. (1976). “Designing to reduce construction costs.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 102(4), 587–592.
16.
Putnam, A. O. (1985). “A redesign for engineering.” Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 139–144.
17.
Quinn, J. B. (1985). “Managing innovation: Controlled chaos.” Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 73–84.
18.
Rossow, J. K., and Moavenzadeh, F. (1974). “The construction industry: A review of the major issues facing the industry in the U.S.” Research Report R 74‐44, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
19.
Sanvido, V. E., and Medeiros, D. J. (1990). “Applying computer‐integrated manufacturing concepts to construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt. ASCE, 116(2), 365–379.
20.
Tatum, C. B. (1987). “The project manager's role in integrating design and construction.” Project Mgmt. J., 18(2), 96–107.
21.
Tatum, C. B., Vanegas, J., and Williams, J. (1985). “Constructibility Improvement During Conceptual Planning.” Technical Report No. 290. The Construction Institute, Stanford, Univ., Stanford, Calif.
22.
Teicholz, P. M. (1989). “Integration of microcomputers applications—Current and future approaches.” Technical Report No. 007, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford, Univ., Stanford, Calif., 1–9.
23.
Wilson, J. L. (1987). Proc. of Workshop on Constr. Automation: Comput. Integrated Constr., National Science Foundation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 118 • Issue 2 • June 1992
Pages: 385 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1992
Published in print: Jun 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.