Construction Scheduling: Principles, Practices, and Six Case Studies
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 117, Issue 4
Abstract
The paper presents a review of the need for the planning and monitoring of construction work, a description of the characteristics of site construction work, particularly the degree of task repetition required for project execution, a review of two planning models comprising the critical path model, which is based on the concept that a project consists of a series of discrete activities, and the linear scheduling‐flow line model, which is based on the concept that a project consists of a series of repetitive activities. The practices of contractors when confronted with a construction scheduling problem and the use of the techniques derived from the models are examined. Six successful case studies are included, including two renovation projects and four commercial office buildings, two based on the critical path method, two based on the flow line method, and two that use both models in appropriate sections. The paper concludes with the general observations that: Few contractors use planning techniques to their full potential; critical path methods are best suited to nonrepetitive projects; flow line is best suited to repetitive projects; and as most contracts have dual characteristics, no single system can meet all a contractor's requirements for planning and monitoring construction work.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arditi, D., and Albulak, M. (1985). “Line of balance scheduling in pavement construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 112(3), 411–423.
2.
Bernold, L. (1989). “Simulation of non steady construction processes.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 115(1), 163–178.
3.
Building on IT‐A survey of information technology trends and needs in the construction industry. (1989). Peat Marwick McLintock Publications, London, U.K.
4.
Cohenca, D., Laufer, A., and Ledbetter, W. B. (1989). “Factors affecting construction planning efforts.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 115(1), 70–87.
5.
Coskunoglu, O. (1984). “Optimal compression of PERT networks.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 110(4), 437–446.
6.
Halpin, D. W. (1977). “CYCLONE—Method for modeling job site processes.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 103(3), 489–499.
7.
Jaafari, A. (1984). “Criticism of C.P.M. for project planning analysis.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 110(2), 222–233.
8.
Lumsden, P. W. (1968). The line of balance method., Pergamon Press, Elmsford, N.Y.
9.
McCough, E. H. (1982). “Scheduling: Effective methods and techniques.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(1), 75–84.
10.
Miller, R. W. (1963). Schedule, cost and profit control with PERT. McGraw Hill, New York, N.Y.
11.
Moder, J. J., and Phillips, C. R. (1964). Project management with C.P.M. and PERT. Reinhold, New York, N.Y.
12.
Mohr, W. E. (1978). “Project management and control in the building industry.” The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
13.
Paulson, B. (1976). “Concepts of project planning and control.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 102(1), 67–80.
14.
Programming house building by line of balance. (1970). The National Building Agency, Longmans, Harlow, U.K.
15.
Russell, A. D. (1990). “Repcon: An innovative construction management system.” CIB 90 Building Economics and Construction Management Conf., Conseil International du Bâtiment, Paris, France.
16.
Russell, A. D. (1985). “Micro computers, management and highrise construction: the next step,” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 12(2), 396–414.
17.
Russell, A., and Castleton, W. (1988). “Extensions to linear scheduling optimization.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 114(1), 36–52.
18.
Selinger, S. (1980). “Construction planning for linear projects.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 106(2), 195–207.
19.
Sidwell, A. C., and Cole, L. J. R. (1986). “Computers in construction management.” South Australian Institute of Technology, Adelaide, Australia.
20.
Sidwell, A. C., and Cole. L. J. R. (1989). “Computers in construction management, the final report.” South Australian Inst. of Tech., Adelaide, Australia.
21.
Slipchenko, P. S. (1966). “Basic principles and experience of application of flowline production methods in construction.” CIB Industrialized Building Conf., Conseil International du Bâtiment, Paris, France.
22.
Stradal, O., and Chacha, J. (1982). “Time space scheduling method.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(3), 445–457.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 117 • Issue 4 • December 1991
Pages: 579 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1991
Published in print: Dec 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.