Sensor‐Integrated Nailing for Building Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 117, Issue 2
Abstract
It is generally acknowledged that there is a great need to increase safety, productivity, and quality in construction. Recent developments in high‐tech areas have offered the opportunity to reevaluate production methods and tools believed to be state of the art for decades. While many new construction technologies under investigation would require a revolutionary development in the industry, the potentials for evolutionary improvements of existing construction technologies are vast. This paper discusses one example of high‐tech evolution in building construction that has proven to increase the productivity of nailing and promises to counter balance the loss of skilled construction workers. The present study includes both laboratory and field testing of a sensor integrated nailer in construction. The results of these tests are discussed as well as recommendations for further improvements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, M. (1974). Design of experiments. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
2.
Bernold, L. E. (1986). “Automation and robotization in construction: The search for potentials.” Proc. 10th Triennial Conf. of CIB/86, International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, 1,073–1,082.
3.
Bernold, L. E. (1987). “Automation and robotization in construction: A challenge and a chance for an industry in transition.” Int. J. Project Mgmt., 5(3), 155–160.
4.
Cunningham, J. (1976). Using the learning curve as a management tool. McGraw‐Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
5.
Fisher, L. (1974). Comparative cost study of fastener corporation's screw‐fast screwdriver powered by Black and Decker's motor unit versus the conventional handfed screwdriver with magnetic tip. Nat. Association of Home Builders, Upper Marlboro, Md.
6.
Fisher, L. (1978). Comparative in‐place cost of floor and roof sheathing fastened with power fastening equipment versus manual fastening tools. Nat. Association of Home Builders, Upper Marlboro, Md.
7.
Kangari, R., and Halpin, D. W. (1989). “Potential robotics utilization in construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 115(1), 126–143.
8.
Maynard, H. B. (1971). Industrial engineering handbook. McGraw‐Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
9.
Miller, M. (1989). “Study on the integration of a stud sensor and nailgun for use in residential wood construction,” thesis presented to the University of Maryland, at College Park, Md., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
10.
Parker, H. W., and Oglesby, C. H. (1972). Methods improvement for construction managers. McGraw‐Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
11.
Stern, E. G. (1959). Better utilization of wood through assembly with improved nail fasteners. Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Va.
12.
Tatum, C. B. (1989). “Organizing to increase innovation in construction firms.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 115(4), 602–617.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 117 • Issue 2 • June 1991
Pages: 213 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1991
Published in print: Jun 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.