Advantages of Management Contracting—Critical Analysis
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 117, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper is based on a review of the literature on management contracting and findings from a program of interviews with top‐level managers of client, design and contracting organizations in the United Kingdom. An influence diagram showing interrelationships between advantages cited for management contracting is used, to structure a critical discussion under four general headings: fast completion, improved design, lower costs, and better supervision and coordination. Another section examines the effect of management contracting on project uncertainty. Client reasons for choosing management contracting are identified and related to perceived advantages of management contracting. Projects suited to the use of management contracting are those that are large, complex, have a need for flexibility, and can gain advantage from early completion. However a number of important provisos suggest that management contracting will only work if everyone involved understands how to make it work and wants to make it work.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barnes, M., & Partners. (1984). “Management contracting for health building—A comparative study.” Summary report for the Department of Health and Social Security, M. Barnes and Sons, London, U.K.
2.
Barnes, M. (1984). “Effective project organisation,” Building Tech. and Mgmt., December, 21–23.
3.
Bennett, J. (1986). Construction management and the chartered quantity surveyor. Surveyors Publications.
4.
Birchall, D. W., and Bottjer, M. C. (1986). “Management contracting—The views of general contractors.” Building Tech. and Mgmt., Aug./Sep., 40–43.
5.
Cornes, D. (1989). “The concept of design,” Construction contract policy: Improved procedures and practice, J. Uff and P. Capper, eds., Ctr. of Constr. Mgmt., King's College, London, England, 67–73.
6.
Curtis, B. (1989). Observations from interviews with senior management in client, professional and contracting organisations. Sci. and Engrg. Res. Council (SERC) funded research program on “Roles, responsibilities and risk in management contracts,” GR/E 48343.
7.
Elton, J. R. (1985). “Management contracting.” Inst., of Civ. Engrs. (ICE) Conference Proceedings on Management of International Projects, 77–83.
8.
Foxhall, W. B. (1972). “Professional construction management and project administration.” AIA and Architectural Record, 85.
9.
Franks, J. (1984). Building procurement systems—A guide to building project management. Chartered Inst. of Building, Ascot, Berkshire, England.
10.
Hayes, R. (1985). “The risks of management contracting.” Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Dec., 8, 197–198.
11.
Hayes, R. W., Perry, J. G., and Thompson, P. A. (1983). “Management contracting.” Report No. 100, Constr. Industry Res. and Information Association (CIRIA), London, England.
12.
McKinney, J. (1983). “Management contracting.” Occasional Paper No. 30, Chartered Inst. of Building, Ascot, Berkshire, England.
13.
Nahapiet, J., and Nahapiet, H. (1985). “The vexed question of project performance.” The management of construction projects, Chartered Inst. of Building, Ascot, Berkshire, England.
14.
Naoum, S. G., and Langford, D. A. (1984). “Management contracting: A review of the system,” CIB Conference, Waterloo, Canada, 1001–1009.
15.
Naoum, S. G., and Langford, D. (1987). “Management contracting—The client's view.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., 111(3), 369–384.
16.
Sidwell, A. C. (1983). “An evaluation of management contracting.” Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 1, 47–55.
17.
Standard form of management contract. (1987). Joint Contracts Tribunal, Building Employer Confederation, London, England.
18.
Survey on management contracting. (1985). Centre for Construction Market Information, London, England.
19.
Winter, J. B. (1989). “New roles in contracting.” Construction contract policy: Improved procedures and practice, J. Uff and P. Capper, eds., Ctr. of Constr. Law and Mgmt., King's College, London, England, 159–178.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1991
Published in print: Jun 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.