Span of Control of Construction Foreman: Situational Analysis
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 117, Issue 1
Abstract
The function of the crew foreman has not received the degree of attention in research the crucial role in construction deserves. In this study, we investigate aspects of the foreman's role that have strong implications on the productivity of the crew. By enquiring into how the foreman divides workaday time between various functions and activities, how these are affected by the size of the crew, what factors determine the span of control, and what effect the size of the crew has on its performance, the study has come to the conclusion that: (1) The size of the crew and the managerial assistance, if given, affect the mode of daily activities; (2) the size of the crew can vary considerably, depending on circumstances; (3) the size of the crew can affect its performance; and, finally, (4) the size of the crew has to be adapted to prevailing conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Borcherding, J. D. (1972). “An exploratory study of attitudes that affect human resources in building and industrial construction.” Tech. Report, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
2.
Borcherding, J. D. (1977). “What is the construction foreman really like?” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 103(1), 71–87.
3.
“Contractor supervision in unionized construction.” (1982). Report C‐3, The Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
4.
“Constraints imposed by collective bargaining agreements.” (1982). Report C‐4, The Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
5.
Drucker, P. F. (1986). The practice of management. Harper & Row, New York, N.Y.
6.
Flowerdew, A. D. J., and Malin, P. W. (1963). “Systematic activity sampling.” J. Indust. Engrg., 14, 201–107.
7.
Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design. Addison‐Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.
8.
Gates, M., and Scarpa, A. (1978). “Optimum number of crews.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 104(2), 123–131.
9.
Handa, V. K., and Abdalla, O. (1989). “Forecasting productivity by work sampling.” J. Constr. Mgmt. Econ., 7(4), 19–28.
10.
Hinze, J., and Kuchenmeister, K. (1981). “Productive foreman characteristics.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 107(4), 627–639.
11.
Kay, E., and Meyer, H. H. (1962). “The development of a job activity questionnaire for production foreman.” Personnel Psych., 15, 411–418.
12.
Koontz, H., O'Donnell, C., and Wehrich, H. (1982). Essentials of management, McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
13.
Laufer, A., and Ledbetter, W. B. (1986). “Assessment of safety performance measures of construction sites.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 107(4), 745–756.
14.
Laufer, A., and Shohet, I. M. (1988). “Factors affecting the size of the carpenters crew.” Tech. Report, Building Res. Station, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
15.
Levitt, R. E. (1979). “Union versus non‐union construction in the U.S.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 105(4), 289–303.
16.
Levitt, R. E., Samelson, N. M., Bretxa, J., Mummy, G., and Waugh, L. (1984). “Evaluation of the line foreman safety training course.” Tech. Report, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
17.
Marriott, R. (1949). “Size of working group and output.” Occupational Psych., 23, 47–57.
18.
Mills, D. Q. (1972). Industrial relations and manpower in construction, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
19.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organization. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
20.
Northrup, H. R. (1984). Open shop construction revisited. Indust. Res. Unit, The Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
21.
Oglesby, H. C., Parker, H. W., and Howel, G. A. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction, McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
22.
Ouchi, W. G., and Dowling, J. B. (1974). “Defining the span of control.” Admin. Sci. Q., 22, 357–365.
23.
Parker, H. W., and Oglesby, C. H. (1972). Methods improvement for construction managers, McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
24.
Peer, S. (1986). “An improved systematic activity sampling technique for work study.” J. Constr. Mgmt. Econ., 4(2), 151–159.
25.
Pfiffner, J. M., and Sherwood, F. (1960). Administrative organization. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
26.
Pollina, V. (1970). “Safety sampling—Technique in accident control.” Envir. Cont. Safety Mgmt., Sept., 26–34.
27.
Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., and Hackman, J. R. (1975). Behavior in organizations. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
28.
Rockwell, T. H., and Bhise, V. D. (1970). “Two approaches to a non‐accident measure for continuous assessment of safety performance.” J. Safety Res., 2(3), 225–240.
29.
Samelson, N. M. (1977). “The effect of foreman on safety in construction.” Tech. Report, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
30.
Snyder, N., and Glueck, W. F. (1980). “How managers plan—The analysis of managers activities.” Long Range Planning, 13, 70–76.
31.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
32.
Steiglitz, H. (1962). “Optimizing span of control.” Mgmt. Rec, 24(9), 25–29.
33.
Stinchombe, A. L. (1959). “Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: A comparative study.” Admin. Sci. Q., 4, 168–187.
34.
Tarrants, W. E. (1980). The measurement of safety performance. Garland STPM Press, New York, N.Y.
35.
Thomas, H. R., and Daily, J. (1983). “Crew performance measurement via activity sampling.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 109(3), 309–320.
36.
Thomas, H. R., Guevara, J. M., and Gustenhoven, C. T. (1984). “Improving productivity estimates by work sampling.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 110(2), 178–188.
37.
Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Oxford Univ. Press, London, U.K.
38.
Worthy, J. C. (1959). Big business and free men. Harper & Row, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 117 • Issue 1 • March 1991
Pages: 90 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1991
Published in print: Mar 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.