Organizing to Increase Innovation in Construction Firms
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 115, Issue 4
Abstract
Driving forces in the construction industry indicate that the ability to innovate is quickly becoming a competitive necessity. Changes in owners' demands and more complex facilities require new approaches in both design and construction. Investigations of other industries reveal organizational characteristics of innovative firms, but construction's institutional framework, products, and technology differ significantly from manufacturing. Based on investigations of successful examples, this paper describes elements of organizational structure and culture that appear to foster construction innovation. These common elements include supportive policies and priorities, flexibility in unit size and grouping, intra‐ and interorganizational coordination, and staffing to satisfy specific requirements for key positions. This paper describes each of these elements and gives examples from a study of innovations. The descriptions of these elements include recommendations for managers seeking to organize for increased innovation, and the conclusions include research insights and needs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
2.
Becker, J. M. (1986). “Rowes wharf: a case study in substructure innovation.” Proc., technical session: Construction innovation, demands, successes, and lessons. ASCE Spring Convention, C. B. Tatum, ed., 1–10.
3.
Building for tomorrow: Global enterprise and the U.S. construction industry. (1988). National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
4.
Cassimatis, P. J. (1969). Economics of the construction industry. The Conference Board, New York, N.Y.
5.
Construction R&D in a research program and strategy to foster technology advancement in the U.S. construction industry. (1981). The Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
6.
“Foreign awards continue decline in most regions.” (1987). Eng. News Rec., Jul. 16, 219(3), 26–53.
7.
From vision to reality: Managing innovation. (1985). Arthur D. Little, Cambridge, Mass.
8.
Galbraith, J. (1977). Organization design. Addison‐Wesley, Reading, Mass.
9.
“High‐tech opportunities.” (1985). Eng. News Rec., 213(7), 64–67.
10.
Howard, H. C., et al. (1989). “Computer‐integrated design and construction: Reducing fragmentation in the AEC industry,” J. Comput. Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 3(1), 18–32.
11.
“Innovation in small and medium firms.” (1982). DECD, Paris, France.
12.
International competition in services. (1987). United States Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C.
13.
Mansfield, E. (1971). Research and innovation in the modern corporation. W. W. Norton Company, New York, N.Y.
14.
Madique, M. A. (1980). “Entrepreneurs, champions, and technological innovation.” Sloan Mgmt. Rev., 21(2), 59–76.
15.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
16.
Moavenzadeh, F. (1985). “Construction's high‐technology revolution.” Tech. Rev., 88(7), 32–41.
17.
More construction for the money. (1983). Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
18.
Nam, C. H., and Tatum, C. B. (1989). “Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology.” Construction management and economics, 6(2), 133–148.
19.
Nerses, H. M. G., and Tatum, C. B. (1975). “Fort St. Vrain PCRV bottom head construction.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 101(2), 391–402.
20.
“A new road opens up private investment.” (1987). Eng. News Rec., 218(26), 24–27.
21.
Paulson, B. C., Jr. (1985). “Automation and robotics for construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 111(3), 190–207.
22.
Peters, T., and Austin, N. (1985). A passion for excellence. Random House, New York, N.Y.
23.
Peters, T., and Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best run companies. Harper and Row, New York, N.Y.
24.
Pinchot, G. (1985). Entrepreneuring. Harper and Row, New York, N.Y.
25.
Putman, A. O. (1985). “A redesign for engineering.” Harvard Business Rev., 63(3), 139–144.
26.
Quinn, J. B. (1985). “Managing innovation: Controlled chaos.” Harvard Business Rev., 63(3), 73–84.
27.
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
28.
Stewart, W. S., and Tatum, C. B. (1987). “Segmental placement of the Renton outfall: A construction innovation.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 114(3), 390–407.
29.
Susskind, C., and Zybkow, M. (1978). “The process of innovation: the organizational and individual contexts.” Technological innovation: A critical review of current knowledge, P. Kelly and M. Kranzberg, eds., San Francisco Press, Inc., San Francisco, Calif., 47–118.
30.
Tatum, C. B. (1983). “Innovations in nuclear concrete construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 109(2), 131–145.
31.
Tatum, C. B. (1984a). “Organizing large projects: How managers decide.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 110(3), 346–358.
32.
Tatum, C. B. (1984b). “What prompts construction innovation?” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 110(2), 311–323.
33.
Tatum, C. B. (1986a). “Designing project organizations: An expanded process.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 259–272.
34.
Tatum, C. B. (1986b). “Potential mechanisms for construction innovation.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 178–191.
35.
Tatum, C. B. (1987a). “Business planning for design and construction firms.” J. Mgmt. Engrg., ASCE, 3(2), 117–126.
36.
Tatum, C. B. (1987b). “Innovation on the construction project: A process view.” Project Mgmt. J., Project Management Institute, XVIII(5), 57–67.
37.
Tatum, C. B. (1987c). “The process of innovation in the construction firm.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 113(4), 648–663.
38.
Tatum, C. B. (1988). “A classification system for construction technology.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 114(3), 344–363.
39.
Tatum, C. B., Bauer, M. F., and Meade, A. W. (1989). “The process of innovation for up/down construction at Rowes Wharf.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 115(2), 179–195.
40.
Tatum, C. B., and Funke, A. W. (1988). “Partially‐automated grading: A construction process innovation.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 114(1), 19–35.
41.
Tornatzky, L. G., et al. (1983). The process of technological innovation: Reviewing the literature. National Science Foundation, Productivity Improvement Research Section, Division of Industrial Science and Technological Innovation, Washington, D.C.
42.
Tucker, R. (1988). “Perfection of the buggy whip.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 114(2), 158–171.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 115 • Issue 4 • December 1989
Pages: 602 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1989
Published in print: Dec 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.