Schedule‐Based Construction Incentives
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 115, Issue 3
Abstract
Construction incentives can be useful devices to improve project performance. The use of schedule‐based incentives is particularly attractive because it can result in substantial time and cost savings. Furthermore, the design and implementation of schedule‐based incentives are relatively easy and inexpensive. They are especially applicable to projects for which timely completion is critical. Several different forms and combinations of schedule incentives are available, each having its own advantages. Schedule‐based incentive targets vary from the simplistic, end‐of‐project types, to the more sophisticated intermediate milestones, with various combinations in between. Both bonus and bonus/penalty award schemes are used in a wide array of forms. Contractor participation in the development of schedule targets can enhance the chances for success of the incentive plan, yet such participation is not always sought by owners. Use of bonus‐only schedule incentives is recommended whenever a perceived benefit from above average schedule performance exists. Bonus size should be substantial enough to capture the atten‐tion of the contractor's upper management. Exclusive use of penalties is counter‐productive.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ashley, D. B., and Workman, B. (1985). “Incentives in construction contracts.” Tech. Report No. UTCEPM‐85‐3, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Tex.
2.
“Contractual arrangements: A construction industry cost effectiveness project report.” (1987). Report A‐7, Business Roundtable, New York, N.Y.
3.
Finchum, J. A., Jr. (1972). “Expectation of contract incentives.” Nav. Res. Logist. Q., A(2), 389–397.
4.
Ibbs, C. W., and Abu‐Hijleh, S. F. (1988). “Unique Features of Construction Contract Incentive Plans.” Tech. Report No. 12, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
5.
Ibbs, C. W., and Abu‐Hijleh, S. A. (1988). “Incentive plans: design and application considerations.” Constr. Ind. Inst. Report, 5(2).
6.
“Incentives in contracts cut roadbuilding costs.” (1988). Engrg. News Rec., 219(3), 25.
7.
O'Connor, M. J., and Colewell, G. E. (1980). “Cost plus incentive fee for construction contracts.” Report No. CERL‐TR‐P‐118, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, Ill.
8.
Smith, S. E. et al. (1975). “Contractual relationships in construction.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 101(4), 907–921.
9.
Stukhart, G. (1984). “Contractual incentives.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 110(1), 34–42.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1989
Published in print: Sep 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.