Bidding Models—Symmetry and State of Information
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 114, Issue 2
Abstract
Several competitive bidding models since the late 1960s have been founded, criticized, and even rejected, based on incorrectly stated arguments concerning the apparent symmetry of the competitive positions of the prospective bidders. The proliferation of these arguments has led to confusion about the validity of the proposed models. This paper: (1) Illustrates the correct use of symmetry in competitive bidding as a function of available information and control; (2) explains the differences among nonsymmetric states of information that lead to apparent symmetry in the case of only two competitors; (3) presents and explains the assumptions that lead to Friedman's general bidding model; (4) proves the probabilistic validity of Friedman's model by using correctly stated arguments of symmetry; and (5) provides the foundations for understanding the limitations of other models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability statistics and decision for civil engineers. McGraw‐Hill, New York, 195.
2.
Carr, R. I. (1982). “General bidding model.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 108(CO4), 639–650.
3.
Carr, R. I. (1983). “Impact of number of bidders on competition.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 109(CO1), 61–73.
4.
Dixie, J. M. (1974). “Bidding models—The final resolution of a controversy.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 100(CO3), 265–271.
5.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive bidding strategy.” Oper. Res., 4, 104–112.
6.
Gates, M. (1967). “Bidding strategies and probabilities.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 93(CO1), 75–103.
7.
Ioannou, P. G. (1984). “The economic value of geologic exploration as a risk reduction strategy in underground construction,” thesis presented to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
8.
Rosenshine, M. (1972). “Bidding Models—Resolution of a Controversy.” J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 98(CO1), 143–148.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1988
Published in print: Jun 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.