Constructability Concepts for Engineering and Procurement
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 113, Issue 2
Abstract
Constructability is the optimum use of construction knowledge and experience in planning, engineering, procurement and field operations to achieve overall objectives. Seven concepts for improving constructability during the engineering/procurement phase of a project are presented and analyzed. A limited number of specific applications of each concept are also presented. The concepts promote construction‐driven schedules, simplified design configurations, standardization of elements, and module/preassembly designs which facilitate fabrication, transport, and installation. Concepts also address the accessibility of manpower, materials, and equipment; design modifications to facilitate construction in adverse weather; and specification improvements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abdallah, E. T. (1982). “Guidelines for producing better specifications.” J. Const. Div. 108(3), 438–444.
2.
Blunk, R. J. (1985). “Design flexibility cuts costs.” Civil Engineering. Jan., 57–59.
3.
Engineering News Record. (1985). “Design house calls for cut conflicts.” Aug., 32.
4.
Fisk, E. R. (1978). “Design evaluation of contractor comments on specifications.” J. Constr. Div. 104(1), 77–83.
5.
Fisk, E. R. (1980). “Evaluation of owner specifications.” J. Constr. Div. 106(4), 469–476.
6.
Glanville, J. H., and O'Connor, J. T. (1985). Evaluation and analysis of constructability improvement ideas. Report to Texaco, Inc. at Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
7.
Glaser, L. B., and Kramer, J. (1983). “Does modularization reduce plant investment.” Chemical Engrg. Progress. 79(10), 63–68.
8.
Holesapple, J. C. (1982). “The fabricator/designer connection.” Civ. Engrg. Nov., 64–68.
9.
Hout, J. C. (1979). “Integration of cost and time with the work breakdown structure (WBS).” 1979 Transactions of the American Assoc., of Cost Engrs. American Assoc. of Cost Engrs., Morgantown, W.Va.
10.
Kliewer, V. D. (1983). “Benefits of modular plant design.” Chemical Engrg. Progress. 79(10), 58–62.
11.
Leon, G. (1971). The economics and management of system construction. Longmon, London, U.K.
12.
Larimore, M. A., and Tucker, R. L. (1983). Data collection methods for collecting constructability improvement ideas. Report to Texaco, Inc. at Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
13.
Marguglio, B. W. (1977). Quality systems in the nuclear industry. ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 95–119.
14.
O'Connor, J. T., and Tucker, R. L. (1983). Improving industrial project constructability. Report to Texaco, Inc. at Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
15.
Rad, P. F. (1980). “Analysis of working space congestion from scheduling data.” Transactions of the American Assoc. of Cost Engineers, American Assoc. of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, W.Va.
16.
Winthrop, R. (1982). “Preassembly modularization.” Proceedings, Conference on Constr. Productivity Improvement. Continuing Engineering Studies, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex., 153–162.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 113 • Issue 2 • June 1987
Pages: 235 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1987
Published in print: Jun 1987
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.