Line‐of‐Balance Scheduling in Pavement Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 112, Issue 3
Abstract
Linear Scheduling Methods are best suited to projects that display repetitive characteristics, but their use in the construction industry is limited. Line‐of‐Balance (LOB) is a Linear Scheduling Method that also makes use of network technology. Its benefits and shortcomings are investigated in a high‐way surface treatment project where LOB has been used experimentally. It was determined that LOB is extremely sensitive to errors in man hour, crew size, and activity duration estimates. There are also problems of a visual nature with the presentation of the diagram. On the other hand, LOB allows a better grasp of the project than any other scheduling technique because it is possible to adjust activities' rates of production. It provides a smooth and efficient flow of resources and requires less time and effort to produce than network schedules. Research to make Linear Scheduling Methods more attractive is recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, H., Fjosne, A., and Solberg, O., “A Network Model for Resource Allocation and Time Scheduling Specially Constructed for Repetitive Processes in the Building Industry,” Application of Critical Path Techniques, J. Brennan, Ed., The English Universities Press Ltd., London, England, 1968, pp. 7–23.
2.
Arditi, D., “Diffusion of Network Planning in Construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 1, Mar., 1983, pp. 1–12.
3.
Arditi, D., “Construction Productivity Improvement,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 1, Mar., 1985, pp. 1–14.
4.
Arditi, D., Harries, T. W., and Trimble, E. G., “Sociological Aspects of Network Applications,” Proceedings of the Third INTERNET Congress, Congress Book 1, Stockholm, Sweden, May, 1972, pp. 33–43.
5.
Arditi, D., and Albulak, M. Z., “Comparison of Network Analysis with Line of Balance in a Linear Repetitive Construction Project,” Proceedings of the Sixth INTERNET Congress, Vol. 2, Garmisch‐Partenkirchen, W. Germany, Sept., 1979, pp. 13–25.
6.
Ashley, D. B., “Simulation of Repetitive Unit Construction,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. CO2, June, 1980, pp. 185–194.
7.
Birrell, G. S., “Construction Planning—Beyond the Critical Path,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. CO3, Sept., 1980, pp. 389–407.
8.
Carr, R. I., and Meyer, W. L., “Planning Construction of Repetitive Building Units,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. CO3, Sept., 1974, pp. 403–412.
9.
Choromokos, J., and McKee, K. E., “Construction Productivity Improvement,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. CO1, Mar., 1981, pp. 35–47.
10.
Contractor's Handbook and Legislative Directory, Illinois Road Builders Association, Chicago, Ill., 1981.
11.
Dressler, J., “Stochastic Scheduling of Linear Construction Sites,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. CO4, Dec., 1974, pp. 571–588.
12.
Harbert, J. A., “Development of the Combined PERT and LOB (CPL) Chart,” Proceedings of the Fifth INTERNET Congress, Vol. Friday, Birmingham, U.K., 1976, pp. 241–246.
13.
Harris, F., and McCaffer, R., Modern Construction Management, Crosby Lockwood Staples, London, U.K., 1977.
14.
Johnston, D. W., “Linear Scheduling Method for Highway Construction,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. CO2, June, 1981, pp. 247–261.
15.
Kleinfeld, I. H., “Manpower Use in High‐Rise Residential Construction,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. CO2, June, 1976, pp. 379–383.
16.
Levine, H. A., Aliberti, E. M., and Ford, B. P., “The Application of Line of Balance on an International Project,” Proceedings of the Fifth INTERNET Congress, Vol. Thursday, Birmingham, U.K., 1976, pp. 251–258.
17.
Lumsden, P., The Line‐of Balance Method, Pergamon Press, London, U.K., 1968.
18.
Mangin, J. C., “Scheduling Methods for Repetitive Tasks in Second Stage Building Construction,” Proceedings of the Sixth INTERNET Congress, Book II, Garmisch‐Partenkirchen, W. Germany, 1979, pp. 287–295.
19.
Melin, J. W., “Fenced Bar Charts for Repetitive Projects,” paper presented at the ASCE Spring Convention, held at Atlanta, Ga., 1984.
20.
Melin, J. W., and Whiteaker, B., “Fencing a Bar‐Chart,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. CO3, Sept., 1981, pp. 497–507.
21.
Mesyef, J. K., “Planning Techniques in Construction Management for Linear Repetitive Construction Projects,” Special Project Report, Illinois Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Chicago, Ill., 1981.
22.
O'Brien, J. J., “VPM Scheduling for High Rise Buildings,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. CO4, Dec., 1975, pp. 895–905.
23.
O'Brien, J. J., “Network Scheduling Variations for Repetitive Work,” paper presented at the ASCE Spring Convention, Atlanta, Ga., 1984.
24.
O'Brien, J. J., Kreitzberg, F. C., and Mikes, W. F., “Network Scheduling Variations for Repetitive Work,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 2, June, 1985, pp. 105–116.
25.
Oldrich, S., and Cacha, J., “Time Space Scheduling Method,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. CO3, Sept., 1982, pp. 445–457.
26.
Oxley, R., and Poskitt, J., Management Techniques Applied to the Construction Industry, 2nd ed., Crosby Lockwood, London; U.K., 1971.
27.
Pedersen, H., “Network Planning of Repetitive Processes in Housing Construction Industry,” Proceedings of the Third INTERNET Congress, Book II, Stockholm, Sweden, 1972, pp. 381–392.
28.
Peer, S., “Network Analysis and Construction Planning,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. CO3, Sept., 1974, pp. 203–210.
29.
Perera, S., “The Chain Bar‐Chart for Project Planning and Control,” National Development, June/July, 1981, pp. 68–72.
30.
Perera, S., “Network Planning of Projects Comprising Repetitive Activities,” IAHS Conference on the Impact of Economy and Technology, Vienna, Austria, Nov., 1982, pp. 827–985.
31.
Perera, S., “Resource Sharing in Linear Construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 1, Mar., 1983, pp. 102–111.
32.
Perera, S., and Ramaswamy, G. S., “Planning of Housing Construction Using Control Charts,” IAHS Journal of Housing Science, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 447–458.
33.
Programming House Building by Line of Balance, National Building Agency, London, U.K., 1968.
34.
Rist, P. T., “Cascade Charts in Construction,” Proceedings of the Third INTERNET Congress, Book II, Stockholm, Sweden, 1972, pp. 415–422.
35.
Roech, W., “Network Planning and Velocity‐Diagrams in Housing Construction Industry,” Proceedings of the Third INTERNET Congress, Book II, Stockholm, Sweden, 1972, pp. 415–422.
36.
Schoderbek, P. P., and Digman, L. A., “Third Generation PERT/LOB,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 45, No. 5, Sept.–Oct., 1967, p. 100.
37.
Selinger, S., “Construction Planning for Linear Projects,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. CO2, June, 1980, pp. 195–205.
38.
Trimble, E. G., and Harries, T. W., “Factors which Affect Success in Network Applications,” Proceedings of the Fourth INTERNET Congress, Paris, France, 1974.
39.
Walker, G. S., “Learning Curve Theory Applied to Networking a Construction Project,” Proceedings of the Sixth INTERNET Congress, Garmisch‐Parten‐kirchen, W. Germany, 1979, Book II, pp. 515–520.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 112 • Issue 3 • September 1986
Pages: 411 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1986
Published in print: Sep 1986
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.