Organizing Large Projects: How Managers Decide
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 110, Issue 3
Abstract
Now tools will help managers design organization structures for large engineering and construction projects. An improved understanding of how managers decide in structuring project organizations is necessary to develop these tools and to assist managers in the systematic design of organizations tailored to meet project goals under unique situations. This paper reports a portion of results from research conducted to determine current practices in project organization design. The conclusion that adaptation dominates this process leads to several implications for industry professionals and researchers wishing to improve project performance. Recognizing the role of adaptation in current practices of organizational structuring will allow managers to avoid inertia and systematically design organizations. Researchers can assist by expanding variables in organization theory to better capture project situation and structure and by developing new tools to assist in systematic organization design.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allison, G. T., Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Little, Brown, Boston, 1971.
2.
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C., Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1963.
3.
Cohen, M., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P., “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, 1972, pp. 1–25.
4.
Cole, V. E., Ball, W. B., and Barrie, D. S., “Managing The Project,” Project Management Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1978, pp. 34–39.
5.
Lave, C. A., and March, J. G., An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences, Harper and Row, New York, 1975.
6.
Lenzner, T. F., The Management, Planning and Construction of the Trans‐Alaska Pipeline System, Alaska Pipeline Commission, Anchorage, 1977.
7.
March, J. G., “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 9, 1978, pp. 587–608.
8.
March, J. G., “Footnotes to Organizational Change,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, 1981, pp. 563–577.
9.
March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P., “The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning under Ambiguity,” European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 3, 1975, pp. 147–171.
10.
March, J. G., and Simon, H. A., Organizations, Wiley, New York, 1958.
11.
Mason, G. E., and Boreen, L. S., “Barriers to Reducing Construction Schedules,” Delays in Nuclear Plant Construction Final Report, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Vol. 1, 1977, pp. 2.1–2.33.
12.
Mintzberg, H., “An Emerging Strategy of ‘Direct’ Research,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 539–549.
13.
Moolin, F. P., Jr., and McCoy, F., “The Organization and Management of Large Projects … Realities vs. Theory,” presented at the seminar/symposium of the Project Management Institute, Atlanta, Ga., 1979.
14.
Paulson, B. C., Jr., Fondahl, J. W., and Parker, H. W., “Development of Research in the Construction of Transportation Facilities,” Technical Report No. 223, The Construction Institute, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1977.
15.
Pelto, P. J., and Pelto, G. H., Anthropological Research: The Structure of Inquiry, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.
16.
Pfeffer, J., “The Micropolitics of Organizations,” Environments and Organizations, Marshall W. Meyer, ed., Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, 1978.
17.
Pfeffer, J., Power in Organizations, Pitman, Boston, 1981.
18.
Scott, W. R., Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1977.
19.
Tatum, C. B., “Managing Nuclear Construction—An Experience Survey,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. CO4, 1978, pp. 478–501.
20.
Tatum, C. B., “A New Matrix Organization for a Construction Manager,” Issues in Engineering—Journal of Professional Activities, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. EI4, 1981, pp. 255–267.
21.
Theodore Barry Associates, “A Survey of Organizational and Contractual Trends in Power Plant Construction,” Los Angeles, 1979.
22.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, Vol. 185, 1974, pp. 1124–1131.
23.
Van Maanen, J., “Police Socialization: A Longitudinal Examination of Job Attitudes in an Urban Police Department,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 20, 1975, pp. 207–228.
24.
Van Maanen, J., “Reclaiming Quantitative Methods for Organizational Research,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1979, pp. 520–526.
25.
Van Maanen, J., “The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1979, pp. 539–549.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 110 • Issue 3 • September 1984
Pages: 346 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1984
Published in print: Sep 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.