Settlement of Construction Jurisdictional Disputes
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 110, Issue 2
Abstract
Jurisdictional disputes in the construction industry have long been a source of lost productivity. While dispute causes have been documented else‐where, the mechanisms for resolving disputes are explored here. Two alternatives are possible, namely: (1) The National Labor Relations Board; and (2) the Impartial Jurisdictional Disputes Board. For each approach, the organization, resolution process, appeal and injunctive relief opportunities, decision time frame, and decision criteria are documented. The two approaches are compared, and the advantages and disadvantages for each are cited. These assertions are based upon interviews and questionnaires. More than 60 industry and union officials participated. It is concluded that a voluntary procedure is highly desirable. The major barriers to developing a satisfactory procedure are: (1) Decision criteria; (2) enforcement authority; (3) contractor stipulation; and (4) scope of application. By far, the most difficult issue is that of decision criteria. The unions want the primary criterion to be past agreements of record and established trade practices. Contractors want more emphasis on efficiency and good management practices. It is concluded that unless this issue is resolved, no voluntary procedure will be satisfactory.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
”ACG Leaves Jurisdictional Plan,” Engineering News Record, Oct. 14, 1982, p. 98.
2.
Coming to Grips with Some Major Problems in the Construction Industry, The Business Roundtable, Business Roundtable Report 2, New York, N.Y., 1978.
3.
Exclusive Jurisdiction in Construction, The Business Roundtable, Report C‐1, New York, N.Y., 1982.
4.
“Construction Gets a New Joint Board,” Engineering News Record, Apr. 16, 1970, pp. 9–10.
5.
“Disunity Kills the National Joint Board,” Engineering News Record, Oct. 9, 1969, p. 67.
6.
Fondahl, J. W., and Paulson, B. C., Jr., The Impact of Exclusive Craft Jurisdiction in the Construction Industry, Technical Report No. 263, The Construction Institute, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., Oct., 1981.
7.
Heuer, Dennis W., “An Evaluation of Alternative Resolution Procedures for Jurisdictional Disputes in the Construction Industry,” thesis submitted to The Pennsylvania State University at University Park, Pa., in Mar., 1983, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
8.
“Impartial Board Parties Appear Reluctant to Wrestle with Jurisdictional Problems,” Construction Labor Report, Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington, D.C., No. 1336, July 15, 1981.
9.
“Jurisdictional Plan Sent to Contractors,” Engineering News Record, Sept. 22, 1983, p. 50.
10.
International Association of Machinists, Lodge 1743 versus J. A. Jones Construction Company, 135 NLRB 1402, 1962.
11.
National Consrruction Employers Council, “NCEC Jurisdictional Disputes Plan Task Force Statement of Principles,” Washington, D.C., Sept. 9, 1981.
12.
National Labor Relations Board versus Plasters' Local Union No. 79, 404 U.S. 116, 1971.
13.
National Labor Relations Board versus Radio and Television Broadcast Engineers (CBS), 364 U.S. 573, 1961.
14.
Paulson, Boyd C., and Fondahl, J. W., “Craft Jurisdiction Impact on Construction,” Journal of the Construction Engineering and Management Division, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 4, Paper 18404, Dec., 1983, pp. 369–386.
15.
Plan for the Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes in the Construction Industry: Agreements and Decisions Rendered Affecting the Building Industry, Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL‐CIO, June 1, 1977.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1984
Published in print: Mar 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.