Abstract

Effective communication is essential in the construction industry to ensure coordination and collaboration among stakeholders for successful project outcomes. However, traditional communication methods often fall short in meeting the industry’s complex demands, often leading to delays, errors, and increased cost. This emphasizes the need for innovative communication solutions, including augmented reality (AR), to help improve communication practices in construction. By integrating virtual elements onto the real-world, AR enhances visualization, information sharing, and collaboration; these are some of the benefits of leveraging AR to ease communication challenges between project stakeholders in various locations. AR tools and applications include remote collaboration, virtual site visits, and real-time progress tracking. However, the successful adoption of AR in construction requires use-based guidance to inform users on effective AR utilization, including guidance on which tools may be feasible and beneficial in a given context. Previous studies exploring the use of AR as a communication tool have revealed different factors affecting the efficacy of using this technology. The objective of this paper is to build on the previously reported factors affecting the efficacy of AR for communication on live construction sites to create a guiding framework for implementation of technological tools and methods supporting successful AR implementation. This framework is developed based on rounds of modified Delphi panels that comprise panelists that have previous experience in using AR for communication, and panelists without experience with AR. In capturing both user types as Delphi panelists, the authors ensure that the developed framework is practitioner-friendly and can guide effective decision-making.

Practical Applications

This paper serves as a resource for site construction practitioners seeking to integrate augmented reality (AR) as an effective communication tool throughout the construction process. By offering a practical guiding framework, the paper facilitates the implementation of AR for interaction purposes between on-site and off-site personnel, reforming communication channels. Construction professionals can leverage AR technology to conduct inspections, address inquiries, and collaborate efficiently, bridging the gap between those physically present at the construction site and those working remotely. Within the framework presented in this paper, the implementation of AR is facilitated through a breakdown of each supporting tool, accompanied by specifications and considerations for their effective utilization in varying site conditions. By offering users a clear understanding of the specifications of each tool, such as their capabilities, features, and technical requirements, the framework empowers construction practitioners to make informed decisions tailored to their specific project needs, ensuring that practitioners can select the most suitable AR solutions for tasks like inspections, collaborative discussions, and problem-solving. This approach not only enhances the overall efficiency of communication but also maximizes the utility of AR technology in diverse construction scenarios, ultimately contributing to the successful integration of AR into the construction workflow.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the Nevada Department of Transportation under Grant No. AGR P676-19-803.

References

Aghajanian, J., and S. Prince. 2009. “Face pose estimation in uncontrolled environments.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., British Machine Vision Conf., 3. London: The British Machine Vision Association. https://doi.org/10.5244/C.23.76.
Azuma, R. T. A. 1997. “Survey of augmented reality.” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6 (4): 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355.
Berner, A. 2020. Augmented reality the past, the present and the future. Aarhus, Denmark: Interaction Design Foundation.
Chalhoub, J., and S. K. Ayer. 2018. “Using mixed reality for electrical construction design communication.” Autom. Constr. 86 (Jun): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.028.
Chalhoub, J., S. K. Ayer, and S. T. Ariaratnam. 2021. “Augmented reality for enabling un-and under-trained individuals to complete specialty construction tasks.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 26 (Sep): 128–143.
Chen, K., W. Chen, C. T. Li, and J. C. Cheng. 2019. “A BIM-based location aware AR collaborative framework for facility maintenance management.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 24 (Mar): 360–380.
Cheng, W. L. E., H. Li, P. E. Love, and Z. Irani. 2001. “Network communication in the construction industry.” Corporate Commun. Int. J. 6 (2): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280110390314.
Côté, S., M. Beauvais, A. Girard-Vallee, and R. Snyder. 2014. “A live augmented reality tool for facilitating interpretation of 2D construction drawings.” In Vol. 8853 of Proc., Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Int. Conf. on Augmented and Virtual Reality, AVR 2014, edited by L. De Paolis and A. Mongelli, 421–427. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Datcu, D., M. Cidota, H. Lukosch, and S. Lukosch. 2014. “On the usability of augmented reality for information exchange in teams from the security domain.” In Proc., IEEE Joint Intelligence and Security Informatics Conf., 160–167. New York: IEEE.
Davila Delgado, J. M., L. Oyedele, T. Beach, and P. Demian. 2020a. “Augmented and virtual reality in construction: Drivers and limitations for industry adoption.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (Apr): 04020079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001844.
Davila Delgado, J. M., L. Oyedele, P. Demian, and T. Beach. 2020b. “A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 45 (Jun): 101122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101122.
Diao, P. H., and N. J. Shih. 2019. “Trends and research issues of augmented reality studies in architectural and civil engineering education—A review of academic journal publications.” Appl. Sci. 9 (9): 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091840.
El Kassis, R., S. K. Ayer, M. El Asmar, and P. Tang. 2021. “Defining factors that support or hinder commercially available augmented reality (AR) devices for construction communication.” In Proc., Computing in Civil Engineering 2021, 1302–1310. Reston, VA: ASCE.
El Kassis, R., S. K. Ayer, M. El Asmar, and P. Tang. 2022a. “Augmented reality communication on active construction sites: A pilot study exploring non-technological factors.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2022: Computer Applications, Automation, and Data Analytics, 1202–1211. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483961.126.
El Kassis, R., S. K. Ayer, M. E. El Asmar, and P. Tang. 2022b. “Discovering factors that influence the use of augmented reality for communication on active highway construction sites.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2677 (5): 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221131311.
El Kassis, R., K. A. Steven, and M. El Asmar. 2023. “Augmented reality applications for synchronized communication in construction: A review of challenges and opportunities.” Appl. Sci. 13 (13): 7614. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137614.
Emmitt, S., and C. Gorse. 2006. Communication in construction teams. London: Taylor & Francis.
Fenais, A., S. T. Ariaratnam, S. K. Ayer, and N. Smilovsky. 2019. “Integrating geographic information systems and augmented reality for mapping underground utilities.” Infrastructures 4 (4): 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040060.
Gamil, Y., and I. Abdul Rahman. 2017. “Identification of causes and effects of poor communication in construction industry: A theoretical review.” Emerging Sci. J. 1 (Nov): 239–247. https://doi.org/10.28991/ijse-01121.
Lin, J. R., J. Cao, J. P. Zhang, C. van Treeck, and J. Frisch. 2019. “Visualization of indoor thermal environment on mobile devices based on augmented reality and computational fluid dynamics.” Autom. Constr. 103 (Sep): 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.007.
Milgram, P., and F. Kishino. 1994. “Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays.” IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 77 (12): 1321–1329.
Minooei, F., N. Sobin, P. M. Goodrum, and K. R. Molenaar. 2018. “Managing public communication strategies in accelerated highway construction projects.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (26): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118759943.
Shin, D. H., and P. S. Dunston. 2009. “Evaluation of augmented reality in steel column inspection.” Autom. Constr. 18 (2): 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.05.007.
Soria, G., L. M. Ortega Alvarado, and F. R. Feito. 2018. “Augmented and virtual reality for underground facilities management.” J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 18 (4): 041008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040460.
Thangaratinam, S., and C. W. Redman. 2005. “The delphi technique.” Obstetrician Gynaecologist 7 (2): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.7.2.120.27071.
Wang, X. 2009. “Augmented reality in architecture and design: Potentials and challenges for application.” Int. J. Archit. Comput. 7 (2): 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1260/147807709788921985.
Wang, X., and P. S. Dunston. 2008. “User perspectives on mixed reality tabletop visualization for face-to-face collaborative design review.” Autom. Constr. 17 (4): 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.07.002.
Wang, X., and P. S. Dunston. 2013. “Tangible mixed reality for remote design review: A study understanding user perception and acceptance.” Visualization in Eng. 1 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2213-7459-1-8.
Wu, W., A. Sandoval, V. Gunji, S. K. Ayer, J. London, L. Perry, K. Patil, and K. Smith. 2020. “Comparing traditional and mixed reality facilitated apprenticeship learning in a wood-frame construction lab.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (Dec): 04020139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000194.
Zhou, Y., H. Luo, and Y. Yang. 2017. “Implementation of augmented reality for segment displacement inspection during tunneling construction.” Autom. Constr. 82 (Mar): 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.02.007.
Zollmann, S., C. Hoppe, S. Kluckner, C. Poglitsch, H. Bischof, and G. Reitmayr. 2014. “Augmented reality for construction site monitoring and documentation.” In Proc., IEEE 2014, 137–154. New York: IEEE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Nov 27, 2023
Accepted: Mar 28, 2024
Published online: Jun 26, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 26, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Researcher, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85281 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1875-1043. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 99999-1111. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-6501. Email: [email protected]
Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85281. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85281. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3307-4693. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share